📰 Rules Enabling Act News
Rules Enabling Act News Today
Fast, Ad-Free News Updates
Stay updated with breaking news from Rules Enabling Act. Real-time updates on events, politics, business and more.
April 19, 2024
On March 12, 2024, the Judicial Conference of the United States announced new guidance applying to case assignments in federal district courts, with the intent to curb “judge-shopping”...
April 3, 2024
The Petitions of the Week column highlights a selection of cert petitions recently filed in the Supreme Court. A list of all petitions we’re watching is available here. During World War II, Congress authorized President Franklin Roosevelt to enlist oil refineries for the war effort. Centralization
January 15, 2024
On January 3, 2024, the defendant in Heppard v. Dunham's Athleisure Corporation filed an interlocutory appeal to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit...
January 12, 2024
On January 3, 2024, the defendant in Heppard v. Dunham’s Athleisure Corporation filed an interlocutory appeal to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit, arguing that the U.S....
August 31, 2023
Editor’s Note: In the article below, Manatt discusses the Ninth Circuit’s new opinion in the ongoing Wit v. United Behavioral Health litigation and the changes from the now-vacated...
August 28, 2023
This week, the Ninth Circuit considers ERISA claims alleging that a plan administrator unlawfully utilized internal guidelines more stringent than the terms of plaintiffs’ plans and the...
March 28, 2023
In an uncharacteristic move, Gorsuch offers a trenchant warning about giving too much power to judges.
February 9, 2023
The Ninth Circuit has issued a new opinion in the long-running Wit v. United Behavioral Health litigation that changes the legal landscape for ERISA class actions. The Ninth Circuit’s...
February 9, 2023
The Ninth Circuit has issued a new opinion in the long-running Wit v. United Behavioral Health litigation that changes the legal landscape for ERISA class actions.
January 30, 2023
In Wit v. United Behavioral Health, the plaintiffs brought claims under the ERISA, asserting that the defendant utilized internal guidelines for reviewing claims for behavioral health services under health benefit plans that were more restrictive than the terms of the plans