Side of wanting to support it, and developing and blossoming to make everything a lot safer for everybody. So thank you. Okay. Supervisors, my name is francisco. I support the Community Benefit district. I think it is a little bit different. In 1989 when we had the earthquake and i worked at the presidio, we formed a team to address those concerns in the tenderloin. You have heard many of the people who live in the tenderloin express themselves as best they can. We have a budget of 12. 3 billion dollars, and i didnt know in your mind how you can do a Needs Assessment with all the things that the tenderloin needs and you give them a dollar. You must be ashamed of yourselves. More after hearing the concerns of all the organizations that came here to give the tenderloin and the neighboring neighbors addons. Supervisors, you must have empathy and you must have compassion. If you go to the tenderloin, you see practically every nation on this earth represented. So why cant we set aside 500 m
Related topics, such as project merits. While i will not be addressing these as they are not germane to the appeal proceeding, you have them in your packets. Temporary and housing would be provided. The department of hope weatherness and Supportive Housing generally has not seen an increase in the amount of Emergency Services required in the vicinity of Navigation Centres. Calls for Emergency Services in the area are not expected to increase because of the availability of and connection to services through safe Center Programmes and staff caring for the clients. Even if there were a small increase based on the needs of the population, it would not impact the calls in the area. Calls would be at the site due to one location but this concentration would not constitute a significant effect. Neighbors have expressed concern about an increase in noise from ambulance sirens. Based on date provided by the department of Emergency Services, in the five months following opening of the civic cent
First up are continuances on your calendar. [agenda item read] [agenda item read] [agenda it [agenda item read]. Clerk further, commissioners, under your regular calendar, the project sponsor just advised me that they are requested items 13 a and b at 95 hawthorne street shadow findings and downtown authorization to be continued. They are requested july 25. That hearing date is closed on your calendar, but entirely up to you what date you continue this matter to. Is there any members of the public that wish to comment . Mr. Reuben . Yes, commissioners. Im jim reuben, reuben, junius, and rose. You received a letter the other day from john elberling. Hes here, and you can talk to him, as well. We ask for july 25 because we think 30 days is enough to get our issues resolved, on our way to get being our issues resolved getting our issues resolved, or cant. Reuben, junius, and rose removed 300 masonic from your calendar that day, so there should be a spot to fill, so we stipulate to that co
This is for the proposed Navigation Centre at seawall lot 30. I will highlight why they stand by the transformatio transforma. Its a class 32 class exemption. It boils town to two main points. One, the project is consistent with the five criteria for a class 32 categorical exemption and therefore qualifies asinfill project. Our appeal response dated june 17th, 2019 covers these points in detail and i wont repeat them all today. Instead, i will highlight five of the main points. The first two relate to the projects consistency with the criteria for an exemption and the last three relate to why none of the exceptions apply. We retain nonsequa related topics and these are available for your review. The bulk of the appeal issues, in fact, relate to nonsequa related topics, such as project merits. While i will not be addressing these as they are not germane to the appeal proceeding, you have them in your packets. Temporary and housing would be provided. The department of hope weatherness an
And i just wanted to come and add my support for creating this commission . Ive been hearing a lot of concerns about efficiency which i think is really important to talk about as things are already moving slow and the problem of homelessness is not progressing, but the way i look at it is solving these solutions require multiple input, and it is more inefficient to get plans that wont work and have to start over than do our Due Diligence on the front enter, crafting initiatives on the issue of homelessness and having to go back because we redid it wrong the first time . And i also think its important to weigh the pros and cons. If slowing down things by a few weeks will help more people, i see those few weeks for Community Consideration and Better Outcomes as incredibly worth it. I dont think we need to see it as a negative for our community, i think its a positive for making our efforts go forward. Thank you so much for this issue. I hope we can pass it and change the way that were do