invest in the security of our partners and allies. it also means markets, stable markets for our own products. to put it in president trump s terms, he s jeopardizing the security of those markets and that will be bad for us economically, not just strategically. were you surprised to hear president trump talk about the beautiful beaches in north korea as potential places for condominiums? even the video that they showed and that he showed kim jong-un, it seemed almost sort of an i don t know if any other summit between world leaders where a world leader has shown a video to another world leader to sort of give them a sense of what might happen. you know, i don t think the sale job that started about economic benefits, about personal security, security for
reception of the iranian negotiator make it more difficult to do that sale job to congress whether or not we presume that if iran likes it it s necessarily bad for the u.s. i think it does the optics do complicate things. it is this heroes welcome that the negotiators got in tehran. i think will bolster the argument of some of the opponents to this that the united states gave up too much that the president gave up too much. he was so eager to get an agreement he gave away too much. it s interesting that some iranians are saying that they didn t get enough in this. so i think this is a complicated issue in the days ahead. in the case of negotiation, if the fringes of both parties are mad, it probably means you found a good middle. thank you to nbc news bureau chief.
out there. it changes every national poll to fit the party breakdown used by scot rasmussen of rasmussen reports. but scott rasmussen said, you cannot compare partisan weighting from one polling firm to another. different firms ask about partisan affiliation in different ways. so even the republican pollster from the right debunks the idea that all these national polls should be retooled to fit his methods. let s bring in democratic strategist chris kofinis now. i think we ve seen it all now. this is a heck of a sale job going on. the right wing is going full tilt on this, claiming all of these polls are oversampling democrats. have at it. even, for example, if you see the argument that occasionally you re going to have polls that are off, because that s the nature of polling, you re never going to have consistency across every poll. and if you say, you re right,
out there. it changes every national poll to fit the party breakdown used by scot rasmussen of rasmussen reports. but scott rasmussen said, you cannot compare partisan weighting from one polling firm to another. different firms ask about partisan affiliation in different ways. so even the republican pollster from the right debunks the idea that all these national polls should be retooled to fit his methods. let s bring in democratic strategist chris kofinis now. i think we ve seen it all now. this is a heck of a sale job going on. the right wing is going full tilt on this, claiming all of these polls are oversampling democrats. have at it. even, for example, if you see the argument that occasionally you re going to have polls that are off, because that s the nature of polling, you re never going to have consistency across every poll. and if you say, you re right, there are some meth logical differences into models that different polls use to determine
it changes every national poll to fit the party breakdown used by scot rasmussen of rasmussen reports. but scott rasmussen said, you cannot compare partisan weighting from one polling firm to another. different firms ask about partisan affiliation in different ways. so even the republican pollster from the right debunks the idea that all these national polls should be retooled to fit his methods. let s bring in democratic strategist chris kofinis now. i think we ve seen it all now. this is a heck of a sale job going on. the right wing is going full tilt on this, claiming all of these polls are oversampling democrats. have at it. even, for example, if you see the argument that occasionally you re going to have polls that are off, because that s the nature of polling, you re never going to have consistency across every poll. and if you say, you re right, there are some meth logical differences into models that different polls use to determine likely voters, tell me the poll where gov