In March 2020, a five-judge Constitution Bench declined to accept the contentions of the petitioners to refer the issue to a larger bench of seven judges. After a period of three years, the case was taken up for hearing on August 2.
SC Constitution Bench Reserves Verdict In Pleas Challenging Abrogation Of Article 370 menafn.com - get the latest breaking news, showbiz & celebrity photos, sport news & rumours, viral videos and top stories from menafn.com Daily Mail and Mail on Sunday newspapers.
The report traces the history of Article 370 in Jammu and Kashmir, from its inception during India's independence to its eventual abrogation in August 2019. It delves into the constitutional debates, agreements, and legal interpretations that surrounded the article's status, emphasizing its temporary nature yet evolving permanence. The narrative covers political developments, Supreme Court rulings, and the eventual scrapping of Article 370, leading to the bifurcation of the state into two Union Territories. The complex legal and historical journey of Article 370 is explored in detail, providing context to its significant impact on the region.
On Day 11 of the hearings in a batch of petitions challenging the August 5, 2019 decision to put an end to the autonomy guaranteed to Jammu and Kashmir under Article 370 of the Constitution, the Solicitor General of India Tushar Mehta argued that the people of Jammu and Kashmir “rightly lost Artic.
There were no impediments in running an administration in Jammu and Kashmir which could be removed only if Article 370 was removed, argues senior advocate Dushyant Dave on Day 7 of In Re Article 370 hearings, reports Gursimran Kaur Bakshi.