not so much. here was the botched afghanistan pullout caving toe china on every whim. and now, of course, war i the dangerous never ending war in ukraine. biden has turned our country into a doormat for china and into ukraine s bottomless piggy bank. and now it s all escalating. biden warning that under his watch we re heading towardsheadn a nuclear armageddon, saying at a fundraiser, we have not faced the prospect of armageddon since kennedy and the cubanon se missile crisis. and that s what we ve got.nedy a guy i know fairly well, he said of putin. he s not joking when he talksnua about potential use of tactical nuclear weapons or biological or chemical weapons. orso what breaking new intel dd the administration receive thatl would lead us to believe armageddon was imminent? you have new intel that caused the president to ratchet up the level of concern? no, the president was speaking n about concerns about putin ss of threats to use nuclear weapons, just as he did at the u
and we have done over the pastoa few weeks, you ve heard us say n this over and over again.e you ve heard it from the national security adviser, jake sullivan. how seriously we are taking this. and that s what joini the president was speaking tngo joining me now is wisconsin congressman tom tiffeny, who now sits in the seat. my husband once out and then ryan , ceo of american majority nedd, the blank check we ve been giving to ukraine have apparently turned zelenskyy eck we havsort of petulant child because now he s demanding this of gnato watch what they need to do to prevent, deter the use of nuclear weapons. butf preventive strikes, preventive action so thatt woul russia would knew what would s happen t so that. his spokesperson was forced to clean this up, saying thatkyy zelenskywanty actually wanted fm sanctions and not a strike. hard for me to believe he got te those two words confused. but again, he s calling for preemptive strikes on russia.on is is he insane? and where
because they re aware that foreign nationals are trying to influence a u.s. election and they explicitly overtly take that meeting because they would like to help those foreign nationals in their goal of trying to influence our election in a way that will hurt hillary clinton and help donald trump. if you explicitly take a meeting with the express purpose of trying to help foreign nationals succeed in their attack on the united states, which you understand they are carrying out, if that s the case, then you admitting to taking that meeting, which donald trump, jr., has now done, that is that s a lot of things. but that is not a smart thing to admit to if you re trying to avoid potential criminal liability, say n case these things are ever investigated or prosecuted which i don t know. they might be. who can say. there have been a lot of surprises in the reporting on the trump/russia affair.
wanted this to be no drone zone. even though they don t have a drone. that didn t make it through. eric, the city council passed a resolution saying that if we do get a drone, basically, on the off chance we do actually buy one. that evidence will not be able to be used in a courts. so whatever drone seems to pick up in charlottesville, it s basically just symbolic. it s non-biend go. eric: let s talk about the issues. can you use the drone on public property? can you use a drone on private? to spy on private property. most states will say n can t find out what people are doing in their backyard. the issue that arises, if i go through a traffic light in new york city, it s basically a drone on a stick. you are doing something illegal and public property and you ll get nailed. i m okay with that.