Commission embraced responded to that need there could be this could be an opportune time to look at the fresh controls as they pertain to the pdrs and other tools that can provides Additional Space in the city so pdrs use is displaced and perhaps the urban mixed use have a place to come to tie in the city of San Francisco i will like to chat about the second overarching goal to provide a significant amount of Affordable Housing for middleincome families the plan i think producing a significant amount of mixed Income Housing in San Francisco we want to see higher levels of affordability but the other aspect of the plan to produce significantly higher impact fees what pertains to other parts of San Francisco so the city has access to a infrastructure money to create those complete neighborhoods so from my point of view were pretty fare into this current connective cycle i worried about the pressures from more Affordable Housing and higher impact fees perhaps mandated pdrs and umu distri
Sizings it is something which ill agree with neighbors comments i know by the Zoning District and the particular neighborhoods the average parties is far blow 3 thousand had opened the door to unintended consequences so i believe there is indeed just as commissioner president fong said the difference deny our different neighborhoods the vintage of the homes and topography and ongoing r so on. The trends is amazing in larger new scale construction we have demolishing minimum unit size, however, at that very moment in our discussion today, we are trying to protect that remodel under our doing calculation and encourage the baseline significantly bigger units im concerned eyes and ears as commissioner Vice President richards not combining the challenge for densification for the city largely and some affordability discussion in this particular case the simple discussion about density and its will be primary will result the other different keechz legislation but densification is a challenge