Brought to you as a Public Service by your local cable or satellite provider. Aneesh chopra, in your book, innovative state, the first three words are government doesnt work. Why do you say that . Guest i think it captures the spirit if you ask the American People in general, are you satisfied, the numbers are at an alltime low, and the perception is it isnt working. And even early days in the Obama Administration we saw some of the more challenging launches of services that really we shouldnt expect today in successful, modern, techdriven economy. And closing this gap was a big part of the motivation both for my term of duty in Public Service as well as why i wanted to write the book. Host the subtitle is how new technologies can transform government. Guest yes. Host how does the u. S. Government use technology, and does it do it successfully . Guest well, were moving in the right direction, to be sure. I try to spend a lot of my time thinking about American History in the book. You g
Incidents, even the very high profile ones, start with a spear phishing campaign, start with an enough it shouldnt have been clicked on. I think in that sense some of the very simple things that any company can do in terms of training their employees, knowing what their Program Looks Like actually going to default security measures instead of no secret he measures can make a big difference. And i think from the perspective changing the cost for any given firm, making sure that if there are targets of opportunity that you deny them the simple opportunity to attack you. Any thoughts on your part . From our perspective all of these conversations go into building resilience. Using the framework coming taking the partnership, using collaboration. What i like to refer to is killing the profit model on this opportunistic sense that are adversaries have. All of that goes into making it less worth it for the anniversary. But even more important making us resilient. Even if all that were to work
Have now and there wasnt this consensus around doing those things. Those are two things that have come together that i hope will get carried forward in the next few years to really reach those goals. Anyone want to add on optimism or post 2015 . Let me just say that in my incoming address at the close of the Conference Also tried to share in that optimism but also back away a little bit from putting ourselves in a position where our concerns are 2030 and saying really what do we want to do by durban, which is two years from now. If we just keep the pace were going at, we should add at least, you know, 4 million or so more people on to treatment between now and then. That would be actually where we are plus a little better. And it seems to me that what we need to do with this every twoyear global convening is to start to use it more as an accountability tool and really to use it more as a formal way to measure where we are and what weve achieved. I feel just for myself the new goals, th
Better shape of a potential lawsuit and if you didnt do Something Like that. And i think having Something Like the framework, which isnt a prescriptive rulebook, but its a much more flexible document that is tailored to individual companies makes it a better vehicle to achieve that kind of protection than the something that is more prescriptive, set in stone, concrete and difficult to be adapted to individual circumstances. Let me ask a followup on that. The idea of the framework is that it meets you where you are. If you are at a certain level and you are looking at the various aspects of the framework that you are looking at doing. As a smaller business and justice seeking generically that lack the resources to really fund against the nationstate. Are they at least in the context of liability is there any kind of distinction to say ive done my best but i cant go toe to toe with the nationstate. I think the framework is a good vehicle for doing that. It is adaptive, its not onesizefit
The media. Very inflammatory headlines. W. H. O. Says all gay men should be on prep. Nobody said that. Read the guidelines there. I think a real advance. In addition to the recommendation, theres an important recommendation for Community Distribution to reduce overdose deaths, which have actually in countries where theres good coverage of arbs, overdose death has been begun to replace hiv as the leading cause of death win people who inject opia opiates. There was good news on prep, which was the results released the Clinical Trial came out in 2011. Bob grant was the lead investigator. This is the open label extension. So this is really the question of the effectiveness of the prep when its not a placebo trial, when people know what they are taking. The good news is the effectiveness was higher than in the trial. About 50 overall. But looking at blood levels and at people who actually took the drug, it turns out, first of all, that the efficacy was 100 as measured in people who took it