Page 3 - Score Settling News Today

But nothing official just yet. ali. >> but largely, given the -- the experience donald trump had with his first secretary of state, this has been a good relationship for the two of them. >> they seem -- they seem to work very well together. and, you know, mike pompeo came in as the cia director. and managed the president very well. and he has sidelined his other critics and/or adversaries within the administration, right? if it was bolton versus pompeo, pompeo at least won that round when they w...

Love. . >> those are the right words, i think everyone acknowledged. but ones he failed to follow himself. he featured political score settling and personal attacks. >> my critics are political people. they are trying to make point. in many cases theyre running for president and theyre very low in the polls. >> sherrod brown, he and the mayor, theyre very dishonest people. he failed as a presidential candidate. . >> three months ago we read a speech. what was the name of the arena? beto had like...

Sti stirwalt. looks like there will be a round table in regard to these shootings and just the spread of this hate that goes along with social media. your thoughts about whether that will result in any type of policy decisions? >> when democrats are in charge, oil companies are the devil. republicans are in charge, tech companies are the devil. there is no partisan limitation to the way that these parties want to meddle in the private sector and attack and interfere with free market and capitali...

That it rises to the level of criminality. theyre skeptical of mueller. so its kind of a flip deal here in the end. >> you cant have it both ways. and by the way, "the new york times" doesnt buy that. in and editorial for tomorrows paper, they say very pointedly is that one of the things this has shown is the law prevails. and the second thing is that the president is very fortunate that he had bob mueller as his prosecutor. along the way, they take a cheap shot at star but that shows that a lot...

Theyre skeptical of mueller. so its kind of a flip deal here in the end. >> you cant have it both ways. and by the way, "the new york times" doesnt buy that. in and editorial for tomorrows paper, they say very pointedly is that one of the things this has shown is the law prevails. and the second thing is that the president is very fortunate that he had bob mueller as his prosecutor. along the way, they take a cheap shot at judge star but that just goes to show that a lot that goes about here is ...

This is truly one of the best times ever to be an american. you are doing a great job on judges, and you are doing the right thing on trade. but for the past few days, youve stepped on your own message. and given need the needless father to your enemies by talking about john mccain and george conway. on key issues i disagree substantively with both of them, as well, i get it. but there is just too much left to be done to waste a moment on score settling. you are the leader of the free world. in ...

Because an agreement on wall funding may give trump a partial victory, they refuse to budge even if the daca kids get a path to citizenship, even though they would have gotten that last february. guess what? the democrats dont care. score settling and preventing trump from declaring victory. and thats the angle. joining me now author of the new piece "times failing person of the year list: a product of cultural decline." contributor editor and former aide to president reagan. lets start with you...

An agreement on wall funding may give trump i guess a partial victory. they refused to budge, even if the daca kids and of getting a path to citizenship in the process which they wouldve gotten last february. no matter how much a deal would help the country. the democrats dont care. score settling and preventing trump from declaring victory. thats the angle. johnny may now with the reaction is rahim because im, lincoln fell at the claremont institute and author of "times failing person of the ye...

Impeach a sitting justice for what he may or may not have done when he was 17 years old and a private citizen. it would also be a pretext to say oh, no, were not going after him for what he did when he was 17, were going after to him because of what he said he did when he was being confirmed in the senate and he was then a sitting judge. it would be a disgrace to the constitution if the democrats, if they were to gain control, were to engage in that kind of petty score settling. look, im a democ...

Who wrote this e-mail. ive been getting contacts from white house officials ever since the thing published, and every single one of them has floated the name of the person who they already had a grudge against, okay, and theyre all different, okay? so, just based on what im hearing from many white house officials, theyre all pointing fingers at each other and in different directions. they dont know anything, okay? >> so, wait, josh, youre saying this is coming down to people pointing fingers at ...