Enforcement matter in the european union, based on a theory that goes beyond international rules, well allow you to file a lawsuit here and collect the money back. In fact, you can auction off the embassy of the country that sues you. We could do a lot to make it clear that were tired of this onesided debate in which we demand and they give a live, and we give a little more. Because they are threatening to hurt our industry. Its the wrong approach. We need to get much more tough minded. If i could add to that, i agree with the questioner in the main, but i also agree with stu. In the sense of, there is a whole lot of, oh, im shocked that theres gambling in this establishment going on. And there is certainly some hypocrisy, some double standards, and indeed, a lot of the stuff the nsa is doing is doing in cooperation with some of these governments. I dont think that and, also, and again, ive conceded as much, sometimes this is being used as an excuse to justify positions that were alrea
Selfinterest and they are dressing it up in a Data Protection guys, and the only thing that i have ever discovered that they understand is the threat of retaliation, if they go beyond the legal bounds that they have set. That are set by International Trade law. And the u. S. And the u. S. Congress has been reluctant to stand up for companies and say, if you get hit with a case, an enforcement matter in the european union, based on a theory that goes beyond international rules, well allow you to file a lawsuit here and collect the money back. In fact, you can auction off the embassy of the country that sues you. We could do a lot to make it clear that were tired of this onesided debate in which we demand and they give a live, and we give a little more. Because they are threatening to hurt our industry. Its the wrong approach. We need to get much more tough minded. If i could add to that, i agree with the questioner in the main, but i also agree with stu. In the sense of, there is a whol
Through. And im still trying to figure out how these savings are going to be passed on to consumers and of course to taxpayers who put up so much of the money that funds the Medicare Program. So mr. Well ask all three of our professors. Explain to me how somehow these costs, particularly medical costs, because so many of the inversions thus far are medical, explain to me how or even if because youve done some scholarship on this, dr. Desai. Hows this going to benefit the American Consumer and the Medicare Program in particular . Well start with you, dr. Desai. So i think the broad way to think about this problem is to understand that this question relates to the broader question of the incidents of the Corporate Tax. So who pays the Corporate Tax . Theres really three sets of folks who can play. So the first is customers, which is what youre referring to via the Health Care System. The second is workers. The third is capital or shareholders. So whenever there is a taxsaving move, like