in touch really politicised issue. linda, get in touch. we should write a letter togetherm in touch. we should write a letter together- - - together. perfect, i would love that. together. perfect, i would love that- let s together. perfect, i would love that. let s see together. .. perfect, i would love that. let s see if together. perfect, i would love that. let s see if we together. perfect, i would love that. let s see if we can - together. perfect, i would love that. let s see if we can get - together. perfect, i would love that. let s see if we can get the | that. let s see if we can get the two of you that. let s see if we can get the two of you together. that. let s see if we can get the | two of you together. ultimately, that. let s see if we can get the - two of you together. ultimately, you have your own family s interests at heart. people will sympathise with your lender, and jemima is concerned about children s hell. but you are not going to be anti improvin
about the cost of delivering my flowers for £12.50 per day is i about the cost of delivering my. flowers for £12.50 per day is just not feasible flowers for £12.50 per day is just not feasible. biggest flowers for £12.50 per day is just not feasible. biggest thing - flowers for £12.50 per day is just not feasible. biggest thing was i not feasible. biggest thing was that not feasible. biggest thing was that. everyone not feasible. biggest thing was that. everyone goes- not feasible. biggest thing was that. everyone goes on- not feasible. biggest thing was| that. everyone goes on about not feasible. biggest thing was - that. everyone goes on about the nfoney that. everyone goes on about the money on that. everyone goes on about the money on the that. everyone goes on about the money on the scrappage that. everyone goes on about the money on the scrappage scheme, ij money on the scrappage scheme, i couldn t money on the scrappage scheme, i couldn t buy money on the
and you think this is actually a great idea. and you use your work than to do thatjourney. could you not replace it and use the scrappage scheme? ihla it and use the scrappage scheme? no chance. it and use the scrappage scheme? no chance- why it and use the scrappage scheme? no chance. why not? it and use the scrappage scheme? no chance. why not? first it and use the scrappage scheme? no chance. why not? first of it and use the scrappage scheme? no chance. why not? first of all, - it and use the scrappage scheme? no chance. why not? first of all, the - chance. why not? first of all, the van should chance. why not? first of all, the van should have chance. why not? first of all, the van should have been chance. why not? first of all, the van should have been worth - chance. why not? first of all, thej van should have been worth more chance. why not? first of all, the - van should have been worth more than what the van should have been worth more than what the scrappage
they could not find anything wrong with her but made a they could not find anything wrong with her but made a suggestion i they could not find anything wrong i with her but made a suggestion that it was with her but made a suggestion that it was the with her but made a suggestion that it was the pollution with her but made a suggestion that it was the pollution in with her but made a suggestion that it was the pollution in this with her but made a suggestion that it was the pollution in this case i it was the pollution in this case that was it was the pollution in this case that was making it was the pollution in this case that was making her it was the pollution in this case that was making her cough. i it was the pollution in this case i that was making her cough. when it was the pollution in this case - that was making her cough. when the pandemic that was making her cough. when the pandemic hit. that was making her cough. when the pandemic hit. they that was maki
of london s mayor, sadiq khan. if it was a cash grab, as the government s saying, just to raise money, i d have acceded to their demand to expand the ulez without proper consultation and a proper scrappage scheme. this is about helping our air be cleaner and in a couple of years time, tfl have predicted there will be no additional money made because of the number of noncompliant vehicles, but every penny net made is used to reinvest in public transport. improving buses in outer london, improving public transport in our city. and here s the irony of ironies it was this government that published air quality directives. the right thing to do, requiring cities to clean up their air, it was this government that have supported clean air zones around the country the right thing to do in bristol, in birmingham, in bath, but for some reason, they refuse to support london. let s speak now to anthony laverty. he s a senior lecturer in public