Page 92 - Second Question News Today

Referring to is what year it takes place. whether its retroactive to 2017 or fiscal year 17. as details get -- well have more details as it moves forward. two issues. fiscal 17 and calendar 17. for taxpayers its obviously calendar year 2017 that theyre probably most concerned with. the president as we work with congress will have those details to be able to flesh out. i want to go to our first describe. heres neil with connecticut media group. >> good afternoon, sean. thanks for taking my questi...

Better tax treatment than our own companies that stay in the united states. so creating a playing field that encourages manufacturing and growing and creating in the united states, but make no mistake, if a company is in the united states already and expanding in the united states, it will be only to their benefit. if you think about it right now, the way the current tax code works, it almost incentivizes for companies leaving the united states, manufacturing and expanding overseas and sending g...

I did want to follow up on the medical marijuana question. so if the federal government going to take some sort of action around this recreational marijuana in some states? >> thats a question for the department of justice. i believe youll see greater enforcement of it. again, theres a big difference between the medical use which congress has during an appropriations rider in 2014 made very clear what the intent -- what their intent was in terms of how the department of justice would handle that...

Your thoughts looking at this video. >> this could have been tragic consequences. what was the teen actually being arrested for. the second question is and legally you can resist -- i dont suggest you do this, an unlawful or illegal arrest. im concerned about what happened here. >> katy, the teenagers have been ob noxious beforehand, he did pull a gun rather than calling 9/11. >> it was a poor exercise of judgment. he didnt really do the right

>> its a question of where its appropriately addressed. theres a reason. we have to remember this guidance was enjoined last august by a court. its not been enforced. there was no comment period by anyone. by the human rights campaign, by teachers, parents, students. nobody had any input in this. it seems to me a little interesting that if this was any other issue, people would be crying foul the process wasnt followed. the reality is, when you look at title 9, it was enacted in 1972. the idea t...

Out who poses a threat to us. in the previous administration, their hands have been tied. there was exception after exception. the fact of the matter is, were a nation of laws and we have to have a system of legal immigration that is respected. so im not going to be prescriptive in terms of what ices job is. their job and mission is to protect the country and enforce borders and immigration laws. the president has basically uninstructed them to carry out their mission. so the priorities as we di...

Right. we have taken the courts opinions and concerns in the consideration. but the order is finalized. its now awaiting implementation. what we want to do, make sure were working through the departments and agencies so that any concerns or questions are on the front end. were acting with appropriate haste and diligence to make sure that the order is done in an appropriate manner. yep. >> i want to ask about a comment that the treasury secretary made today. he was asked if we should assume tax p...

Adjustment tax with the manufacturers at the white house again today. states like michigan, pennsylvania, wisconsin have a great concern about this tax and seems to be a disconnect between the ceos, the republicans on capitol hill and the president as to whether or not this is appropriate. the question is, could this tax have a chilling effect on manufacturing at a time when places like ohio and michigan and the upper midwest are trying to jump start the economy with manufacturing jobs. i want f...

If we dont, but there are problems in the legal and process way in which that guidance was issued. so its incumbent upon us to actually follow the law and recognize that title ix never talked about this. this was an act in 1972. there was no discussion of this back then. to assume certain elements were thought about back then would be completely preposterous. >> you think secretary devos is on board with this? >> yes, is 00%. >> the second question is on mexico. the secretary of state along with...

Said he misled the vice president with regard to conversations he had with russia. its critical the president get this pick right and so far again he is getting a lot of positive reaction from folks on both sides of the aisle, craig, and also from people who were with the obama administration and part of his national security team. the reason why mcmaster is someone who is served in both iraq wars and also served in afghanistan. he wrote a book "dereliction of futury" which was widely praised in...