question. and meanwhile, we ll have lots of voting changes all over north carolina, georgia, other parts of the country, that we won t even know about and the impact that those are having on african-american and latino voters. what do you mean by that, there will be changes we don t even know about? well, in the world of if the pre-shelby world, any time, if you were in a covered jurisdiction, any time you had a voting change, you had to let doj know, and then they would do a quick evaluation as to whether or not it may be problematic under the voting rights act. now people can make voting changes of all kinds and there s no requirement that there s notice, there s no requirement that there is any kind of scrutiny as to whether or not those changes are going to negatively impact african-american voters. and interestingly, chris, just to say, this law was held back by the north carolina legislature waiting to see if the supreme court would invalidate that part of the voting rights
the first iraq war, even in the second there was a considerably more tangible international support. there is just simply not much here. and the idea that we re going to enforce this everywhere. does this mean if russia decided to use chemical weapons against the chechnyans that we would intervene there against a nuclear power? i don t think so. so i think you ve got to look at this realistically. and so far no clear mission. let me go to mr. deutsch on this. sure. second part on this because of the complicated nature of political compromise. because john mccain and alliance with lindsey graham were able to get the democrats formulations committee to add on language, it s called section 5, which really does tilt us in this war saying we change the momentum, all forms of aid, including lethal aid to the groups we like fighting the government this. are you concerned this is going to drag us into this war, because we re clearly taking sides. well, first of all, i m not going to su