security application really has been circulated by this paul ryan super pac and they have really used it againster in her campaign despite that it is not legal for them to have it. what has not been clear until today is how they got it in the first place. candidate abigail spanberger wrote and put in it blunt terms, quote, it has come the my attention that the congressional leadership fund, this pack, has somehow retained a full unredacted copy and has kiss seminatd it for unknown that you recall. it not aware of any legal way your group could have this document. that concern was echoed in a new letter signed by over 200 national security personnel. people with experience at the kramt is that the national security counsel.
it says, neither we nor national security law experts we ve consulted are familiar with any previous case of an sf 86 being released in full to include this history. we have yet to hear why her personal information was released and subsequently made public by paul ryan s political action committee. each year thousands of aspiring publicer is nlts virginia file the same confidence. they must be comfort they are handled securely and never released to secure a political agenda. her security application is being used now for a political agenda against her. we still don t know why this incredibly sensitive document was released to a research if i recall. as noted, as far as we can tell it is a totally unprecedented breach. as of today we do know how that firm and paul ryan s pac did
these democratic candidates who have national security background that s they need to be particularly vigilant about their security. reminds the candidates that they can avail. they of a senior team dedicated to cyber security if these candidates feel like they have need of it. so here s the democratic party. a couple months out from the election saying to all the candidates with a national security background, watch out. a new threat that goes specifically to you. it is a remarkable story. we first learned this candidate s security application had been obtained. and then by paul ryan s pack thanks to this article which broke tuesday night. she was working on counter terrorism issues shelf also worked on the law enforcement side of the u.s. postal service. what has been clear from the beginning of this scandal, cynic it first broke is that abigail s
warning to these democratic candidates hon have national security backgrounds that they need to be particularly vigilant about their security, reminds these candidates that they can avail themselves of a senior team specifically dedicated to cyber security from the democratic party if they feel like they have need of it. so here s the democratic party. a couple months out from the election saying to all the candidates with a national security background, watch out. new threat that applies specifically to you. it is a remarkable story. we first learned this candidate abigail span berger s security application had been obtained by a republican opposition research group and by paul ryan s pac thanks to this is new york times article which broke late tuesday night. abigail was a cia case officer working on counter-terrorism issues. before that career, she worked as a federal agent on the law enforcement side of the u.s. postal service. what has been clear from the beginning of this scand
gorkov meeting with kushner is not a red flag. it s a blaring siren. it is not just contradictories from the white house and the russian side of this. there has been no plausible white house explanation for what jared kushner was doing in that meeting. was it related to kushner family business properties? was it related to the trump transition, was it related to the magnitsky act, was it related to sanctions, ongoing discussions flynn was having at the same time? we have no explanation about whatsoever. jared kushner s m.o. in terms of dealing with the russia investigation is to appear to be completely transparent and cooperate i. his security application was a complete disaster in terms of disclosing foreign contacts. his answer whether anybody in the trump campaign had been in contact with russian officials is a complete disasters in terms of contacts he didn t disclose. but this meeting in particular, what was it about? the white house should have to say what it was about if jared k