but there are in their security. i understand the security arguments, i m saying to do they have the same rights as the jewish settlers were living in the land. literally right next to them. it s a simple question. should they have the same rights? palestinians and jews living in the west bank? yes or no? i think that they should they are citizens of israel. that would be the model. they should have equal rights. look at the arabs, they are professors, doctors, lawyers. they are contributing to the largest bank in palestinians in the west bank s do not have equal rights. i m saying, tomorrow morning should they have equal rights? or should they consider the rights? night i think the palestinians have to find a way to except israel. israel s not going away. the refusal to acknowledge that it s going to be there, the terrorism, the violence? it s going to get results
detention. it was in a case where the arguments for it are the strongest possible indefinitely holding suspected terrorists and enemy combatants at guantanamo bay. there were some strong security arguments there, some of those people looked terrible but that didn t mean a president could overrule congress and the courts to claim those unilateral detection powers even regarding foreigners or suspected terrorists. some of those claims to indefinite detention without trial were rejected by a conservative leaning supreme court and ruled unconstitutional. this history is the context for this power grab today that donald trump s not tweeting about. it s the context from the flores to gitmo to steven miller and this is a time to keep your eye on the ball. i m joined by jason johnson from the root, victor defrancesco soto from the university of texas, and host of advice s latin x.
against the emergency declaration this hour. i don t want to see a declaration. i think that would be done in the most extreme schisms. it is the power of the purse that comes from the elected representatives of the people. it could be climate change. and a one time speech writer for president george w. bush puts a fine point on this particularly galling moment. he writes in today s washington post that security arguments would be at the center of trump s justification. then the ignorance, arrogance, and stubbornness of one man would turn a budget crisis into a constitutional crisis.
the pay for tsa that inspect people before they go on planes so they are not carrying bombs. and those are security arguments as well. are they not? you are de defunding other security priorities and holding up, because, let s be frank, this is a political promise that the president wants to stick to here. can you make the same argument regarding other national security priorities that are being held hostage to this. it is politics on both sides. it is not about the money. the democrats just put forward a budget that increased spending by $20 million including funding for the u.n. population control that would be funding abortions overseas but can t find money to fund our border security. it is politics all the way around. we could go into what is the bigger portion of the deficit and tax cut, et cetera. that is just math. marc, thank you very much. thanks for having me. she might be a freshman but she is firing up republicans.