and you cooperated with that investigation. exactly. and i spoke to members of the blue team who were conducting that investigation, the investigative team. they acknowledged to me that much of what was said was not accurate, but they said that they could not they could tell the committee but it was up to the committee to release that. i think there was a reluctance to focus on the security element in the military you think the january 6th committee was more focused on donald trump than other things that should be addressed in terms of security if there s a future incident? exactly. and i think they wanted to hold back in the army and not come out. and i think your disclosure in fact rebutting or i should say going point by point with the d.o.d. i.g. s findings is really important because that gives an opportunity for d.o.d. to relook and re-examine what they need to do to get to the truth. you re not in uniform today because you re not here as an officer, but you are s
get here? it is shameful that six people died. the majority - get here? it is shameful that six people died. the majority of - get here? it is shameful that six i people died. the majority of those who crossed were afghan men and children. i worked on some schemes as policy adviser but they aren t fit for purpose. it might be controversial to say that afghans cannot register for these schemes on the ground. it isn t practical for those who are in hiding, those who are trying to register or make themselves known to ngos who don t operate inside the country any more, it doesn t make any sense. i m constantly in touch with afghans on the ground and in neighbouring countries who are asking how to flee, how to apply for these there is no way. flee, how to apply for these there is no wa . ., ., flee, how to apply for these there isnowa. ., , is no way. you were a policy adviser- is no way. you were a policy adviser. were is no way. you were a policy adviser. were you is no way. you wer
happening and honestly speaking, law and order is an issue of state, not centre, a prime minister is not directly responsible for law and order situation. directly responsible for law and ordersituation. i directly responsible for law and order situation. i will put it this way, if something happens in scotland, is it rishi, the prime minister here, responsible for that? no. it is the bjp who run manipur sea would like to think that the minister modi. sea would like to think that the minister modi. . . sea would like to think that the minister modi. .. there is a security element involved. minister modi. .. there is a security element involved. and minister modi. .. there is a security element involved. and the - minister modi. .. there is a security - element involved. and the government is there to take action and action will be taken but yes, sectarian violence was an issue much earlier, and talk about the 70s and 80s, the whole of the north east was in trouble. it has now been
prigozhin [inaudible] even though is for a short period of time, the operational headquarters of this war effort. that s where the stock reside, that coordinates all of the [inaudible] . everything from logistics to the level to fire plane strikes and artillery, and all these types of things. that has been disrupted. there is a fairly significant level of chaos, as to who s in charge, that s going to have to shake out over the next couple of days. people don t know, that they can count on weapon systems or if these weapons can be brought to bear. i think one of the biggest stones that the russians have as they have tens of thousands of troops, even if they return to bases, they can t be trusted to stay there. they re going to need some sort of security element. so in a difficult situation, russia really doesn t have a huge amount of actual