going into the hands of terrorist organisations, so there is - a security element to all of this. so, navigating that i complexity is not easy. afghanistan is already experiencing one of the world s worst humanitarian crises, so the impact of this earthquake has been devastating. we know that afghans have already been grappling with a severe drought. the result is destroyed crops like the ones you see here and no meaningful harvest to speak of, and that has knock on effects. in march, the united nations said almost 95% of afghans aren t getting enough to eat. the un called it a figure so high that it is almost inconceivable . let s hear from the world food programme. food assistance, all these families, is not new. what s different now is that families have lost their homes, families have nothing. they are
intelligence were warning, for some time, that an invasion from russia into ukraine was imminent. that s the thing, that input that planning in place. they haven t set up enough emergency centers. you ve got this awful situation where families make it all the way to someone who s driven their needs that they want to pick up, and driven all the way back to another setback to brussels, or centers only open three days a week. how can that be, when there s a war going on in europe. only open three days a week. that s the thing the home office should be getting a grip on. it is gambling can shameful that they have failed to do something so basic. in regards to that, the home office we ll be saying it s the security element that you need to be careful of. the kremlin opportunities masquerading as ukraine s you wouldn t want those criminals coming in at all. there has to be some checks in
there and the russian government t u.s. alleges, isn t doing anything about it. so you could certainly talk about that, you know, pretty directly. and then direct, your officials below you to get going and do something about that. you know whenever you get russia and the united states together. there s definitely the strategic security element. and, remember, they both came together, extended the new start a agreement, the arms control agreement. that s for five years. five years will be ore quickly, and then the question is what s next. and they re extremely dangerous sophisticated weapons, some nuc nuclear, some not, but frightening weapons being developed on both sides. so you have to really figure out what do you do? what comes next after start? excellent question and an issue i m sure will be raised in their conversation. jill dougherty, as always, we
time, write? even any short-term money will take a while before - time, write? even any short-term money will take a while before it i money will take a while before it gets into the pockets of people, if it ever gets there in those countries. and they have a problem right now, what can they do now to stop people trying to cross the border? ~ ., ., ., , border? what i thought was interesting border? what i thought was interesting was border? what i thought was interesting was that - border? what i thought was interesting was that kamala border? what i thought was - interesting was that kamala harris repeated interesting was that kamala harris repeated this basic message, do not coma, repeated this basic message, do not come. she repeated this basic message, do not come, she said twice. and underlined that the come, she said twice. and underlined that the us come, she said twice. and underlined that the us would secure its borders and you that the us would secure its bor