Page 3 - Security Regulation News Today

Its irrelevant. the point is, he was giving political speech. the first amendment kind of covers that. and a natural security tool, the security clearance, which has never been politicized before, is sudden by being used as a tool to either stifle dissent, because thats really what john brennan was doing. he wasnt violating any security regulation. he was simply speaking out against the president. and, possibly, to silence others. possibly even including people inside the intelligence community ...

Downloading porn at government expense. meanwhile madoff commits the most incredible blunder where there is no -- ive had the two extremes one trying to strangle a successful business that wants to expand. and the situation here that is deplorable. >> i wish they were all just watching porn then the industry could grow. the problem with madoff, madoff happen, because of the regulators. if we didnt have security regulation, i dont think bernie madoff could have gotten as big as he was there would...

Downloading porn at government expense. meanwhile madoff commits the most incredible blunder where there is no -- ive had the two extremes one trying to strangle a successful business that wants to expand. and the situation here that is deplorable. >> i wish they were all just watching porn then the industry could grow. the problem with madoff, madoff happen, because of the regulators. if we didnt have security regulation, i dont think bernie madoff could have gotten as big as he was there would...

Prevented? a small piper cherokee did all this, renewing questions about whether there should be tighter security regulation of small aircraft. >> its an issue that congress needs to look at in terms of protecting in a moment federal building -- not only federal buildings, but the american people. >> reporter: -- like charter jets were already in the works. small planes like the one that flew into the irs offices in austin will not be included. the people who own and fly them say they shouldnt b...

Tool to either stifle dissent, because thats really what john brennan was doing. he wasnt violating any security regulation. he was simply speaking out against the president. and, possibly, to silence others. possibly even including people inside the intelligence community and the government now, from speaking out. those are dangerous precedents. those are things that, yes, are bad for the country. were worried about that. but, frankly, it is not good for the president himself. he should stop do...