watching them talk to the press for the first time in a long time. you saw a level of chaos that s been unmatched. you saw a president of the united states literally trying to go into doing something completely crazy that would change our world forever. you saw a president of the united states that doesn t understand the concept of legislating in washington, d.c. that you do need at some level a friend. some friend to help you. you saw a level of self-absorption. he indicating he was speaking the way he was speaking because
pre-twitter. how do you think seinfeld would fall today if we were watching it? well, i think it would do well because it really was kind of the beginnings of the recognition of self-absorption. and we seemingly have stayed self-absorbed ever since. just backstage, you know, when the cameras weren t rolling, did you all get along? any good gossip you want to share all these years later? it s just us talking. no. not really. i think that, you know, there was a it felt like it was an opening night on broadway every time you were doing the show. and so, the concentration was on that. it was on being funny. and so, i think we were all trying desperately to be funny to the best of our ability. and it s like being in patton s army, you know, you got to take the next hill. so, we got along pretty well. thank you for making us laugh and still laugh all these years
grant. he s now in charge of our country and the fate of the world. so certainly beware of the fact that he has these features, but don t call him psychiatric names. psychiatric name-calling won t help him, and it very much harms people who do have real mental illness. that s not to say that you don t have strong feelings about the president. because you go on to say, he s been richly rewarded rather than punished for his grandiosity, self-absorption and lack of empathy. why do you say that is stigmatizes the mentally ill when people apply these sorts of terms to the president, in your opinion? there s a great confusion between people being bad and people being mentally ill. so when there s a mass murder, the question always arises, was he crazy, and the national rifle
northern star. at the end of the day, he will surround himself of whatever and whoever he wants and he won t care about the consequences. during the campaign, there were talks about when we ll see a pivot. is this a trump pivot. there were times where we use a te telaprompter more. a lot of ways he s a very personable frat boy and his appetites were food and deals and women and celebrities and attention and he s constantly feeding these things. the animating force in donald is this self absorption with himself and the rebelling he does on his day-to-day. before the election, both of you told political magazine that you did not think he will win. couple of weeks now, do you have
could decide a contested election. it would just be a 4-3 ruling. and if justice ginsburg were the recusal, it would be a republican majority 4-3 split, donald trump win. justice ginsburg made some very, very inappropriate statements toward me. when donald trump answered a question what is important about the supreme court and he immediately answered by attacking justice ginsburg for something critical she once said about him, i m not saying that wasn t a shocking display of raw narcissistic self absorption in terms of what s important about the supreme court. but it also may have been him laying the groundwork how he would contest the election if he can get it close enough or wild enough of that the election results somehow winds up in the courts. he is already laying the groundwork for demanding justice ginsburg s recusal. meanwhile, president obama s nominee to fill the vacant seat on the court has been weight 7 1/2 months since the president nominated him while republicans