in this specific case, though, was the judge justified in that ruling, and what do you make of rittenhouse s self-defense claim driving across state borders with a semiautomatic weapon, going to the site of the protests. he s not defending his home or business in his backyard or some property he owns. he s driving across state lines to get to the site of the protests and claiming self-defense. i would say it s uncommon and unusual, it s not unheard of, not a never done before thing. but it is unusual for a judge to disallow the use of the word victim in a self-defense trial. but if it was me, i don t think they let them not use that word. so right, there is a nuance here. there is an argument that victim is a loaded term when the defendant is claiming self-defense. however, my issue with the judge is not his decision about the word victim. it s his decision to allow the kyle rittenhouse defense
of the word victim in the courtroom especially if the defendant is claiming self-defense. in this specific case, though, was the judge justified in that ruling, and what do you make of rittenhouse s self-defense claim driving across state borders with a semiautomatic weapon, going to the site of the protests. he s not defending his home or defending a own the. i would say it s uncommon and unusual, it s not unheard of, not a never done before thing. it is unusual for a judge to to disallow the use of the word victim in a self-defense trial. but like it if it was me, i don t think i don t think they d they d let them not use that word, right. so right, there is a nuance here. there is an argument that victim is a loaded term when the defendant is claiming self-defense. however, my issue with the judge