Page 2 - Self Gain News Today

Other important things that are going undone. Within this committees own jurisdiction we should be addressed in the opioid epidemic. We could be working together to find a solution to our immigration and asylum challenges on our southern border. We could be protecting americans for having their intellectual property and jobs stolen by Chinese Companies and we could be enhancing Election Security just to name a few things. Congress as a whole could be working on rebuilding our crumbling infrastru...

They were going to win because they had a three-judge panel with two trump appointees. they lost. they went to the supreme court, they lost. now when faced with having to comply with the law, which is by the way, not that complicated, right, like a majority minority means 50%. it cant be 38% and be more than 50%. they just decided theyre not going to follow the law. so whats going to happen now is theres not going to have to be a new lawsuit. whats going to happen now is the federal district cou...

And lied about it. >> great question. a lot of people are asking that question. being a liar is one thing. the pattern of habitually lying for his own self-gain. what matters? the lie about being at the kennels. its maybe the most important fact in the case. and as a lawyer he knows this. the prosecutors brought this up. the last person to see the victims is going to be one of the most critical things investigators need to know. so his story completely changed. he lied about something that is so...

Were not identified until 20 years later. john, let me start with you, what is your reaction to santos lying about 9/11? >> i mean we got a lot to unpack here, right? he is the forrest gump of common. i mean, the holocaust, pulse nightclub, veterans dogs, 9/11, there is nothing sacred to this man. and for every organization, every group, every background that hes hurt, he did it maliciously for self-gain. its repugnant. its repulsive. its vile. this doesnt end well for him. >> it wasnt just lyin...

Also assurance of u.s. support. >> professor feldman, youve stated that the presidents demand to the president of ukraine constituted an abuse of powers how does the presidents decision to withhold military aid affect your analysis? >> it means it wasnt just an abuse of power, because the president was serving his own personal interests but also an abuse of power insofar as the president was putting american national security interests behind his own personal interests. it brought together two i...

The training weapons but also the assurance of u.s. support. >> professor feldman, you have stated that the presidents demand to the president of ukraine constituted an abuse of power. how does the presidents decision to withhold military aid affect your analysis? >> it means it wasnt just an abuse of power because the president was surfing his own personal interests but also insofar as he was putting american national security interests behind his own personal interests. it brought together two...

Russians and counted on not only the training and weapons but also the assurance of u.s. support. >> professor feldman, you have stated that the presidents demand to the president of ukraine constituted an abuse of power. how does the presidents decision to withhold military aid affect your analysis? >> it means that it wasnt just an abuse of power because the president was serving his own personal interests. but also, an abuse of power in so far as the president was putting american national se...

And etc. he had self gain. >> clearly a conflict of interest. we have known for a while he had the connections with russia. it gets deeper and deeper. running for office, that is technically true. its tricky because people can use your business as a way to influence you while you are running and become an illegal campaign contribution. the fact that russia was willing to talk to him and make noise about doing business with him and trying to do business is disturbing. he was trying to keep the co...

>> i think what they are trying to show is the fact that many of these nominees, for example if youre looking at dr. tom price with hhs or steven mnuchin for treasury, they have potential conflicts of interest that they are on the wrong side of democratic values being that they are pro-wall street and not main street, are utilizing their powers for their own self gain in the context -- >> jenna: sorry to interrupt, but these are themes they tried to use during the election cycle, and they lost. ...

Again, this amplifies the fact that justice was not obtained in the death of 2-year-old caylee. >> how does it make you feel watching this having covered the trial? >> not surprised, randi, not surprised at all. it was just a matter of time before tot mom emerged again in some way trying -- for self-gain and furthering of her own money situation and her own persona. this is just an amplification of that as far as i see. same thing, second verse, same as the first. >> nancy grace, thank you very ...