State, tax politics, and the limits of american liberalism. Professor michael more looks at tax policy and American Attitudes towards taxes from the end of the new deal, to the 1986 tax reform act. This top is warning the series with scholars who used records in the National Archives center for legislative archives for the research. The center senate hosted this amendment right of the video. Thank you for attending todays researcher top historian at the center for a legislative archive sponsor of the series. Weve had a very full program this year, showcasing some of the Significant Research that is still being, done in the house records. Todays top is the eighth of this calendar, near and we have one more november, then we will hear from Charles Stewart Political Science professor at mit, longtime friend and supporter. Of the center. Who is talk about his coauthor book electing the senate, in direct democracy before the 17th amendment. By the prince in your city press, it will be a pre
In the National Archives center for legislative archives for their research. They hosted the event and provided the video. Showcasing some of the Significant Research that is being done. Todays talk is the eighth in the calendar year. We have one more in november. Well hear from charles stewart, Political Science professor at m. I. T. Long time friend and supporter of this center who well talk about his coauthored book with wendy shiller. That ought to be a good talk. I have been looking forward to hosting todays guest. Since i first saw her in action at the history conference chairing a panel that included who we heard from at the researcher talk last december and that will include karl henry, tax historian. Who is in the audience today. Thank you for attending. And well hear from karl henry soon. Molly is an associate professor of history in Washington University and received her ph. D. Degree from the university of michigan. She is the author of the highly regarded tax and spend. Sh
Is still being done. Todays talk is the eighth this calendar year and we have one more in november when we will hear from charles stuart, Political Science professor at m. I. T. , longtime friend and supporter of this center who will talk about his coauthored book about electing the senate and direct democracy before the 17th amendment. That ought to be a pretty good talk. I have been looking forward to hosting todays guests. Since i first saw her in action at last years policy history conference chairing a panel that included members and that will include a tax historian who is in the audience today. Thank you for attending, carl. And we will hear from carl soon. Molly is an associate professor of history at Washington University and received her ph. D. Degree from the university of michigan. She is the author of the highly regarded tax and spend, the welfare state, tax politics, and the limits of american liberalism. She will also Say Something about her current book project which bu
This calendar year. We have one more november. We will hear from a longtime friend and supporter of this center. He will talk about his book, electing the senate and direct democracy. Should be a pretty good talk. I have been looking forward to hosting todays guest since i first saw her in action at last years policy history conference, sharing a panel with others. Some who we heard from last december. A tax historian is in the audience today. Thank you for attending. We will hear from them soon. She is an associate professor of history at washington university. Thereceived her phd from university of michigan. She will Say Something about her current book project, which builds on this book. We should have time for q a. Please raise your hand so we can pass the microphone. And pick you up on the recording. Thank you for attending. Prof. Michelmore it was surreal to come back not as a graduate an employeeas professor of history. To make that trip again. It felt amazing but also sometimes
Since the last oral argument in this case the committee referred to the house of representatives, the house of representatives approved two articles of impeachment. Neither of those articles arise out of the events investigated by the special counsel nor the events described in the report of the special counsel land we are here today facing a different claim by the committee, for some political reasons pages 13 to 17 of the supplements a brief their argument is they need the grand jury information to prove in a senate trial on the articles of impeachment approved by the house, the president s culpability for those high crimes and misdemeanors. There are a couple problems with that. The first is that is not what the court found in this case. The court knows we have significant concerns, we dont think she applied to test at all but put that aside. What the District Court found was the house of representatives was acting preliminary to a Senate Impeachment trial on misconduct in the Muell