simply by taking the guns away from mass shooters before they commit mass shootings. it s not complicated. it s such an obvious solution that you had to think about why we weren t already doing that. who doesn t want to prevent mass shootings? only the gun lobby, everybody else cares about children. americans say they want red flag laws. why wouldn t they? like supporting black lives matter or fighting climate change or getting the covid shot or standing with the brave people of ukraine. red flag laws seem like one of the ideas that no decent person could possibly oppose. you want crazy people to have guns? of course you don t. who would? so naturally, you are for a red flag laws. you may soon get red flag laws across the country. what would that mean if we do? to things you should know. first, red flag laws will not end mass shootings. but red flag laws will end due process. due process is a simple concept but it s the key to everything good about america. in our system of j
to keep and bear arms. of tucker: two things to notice about the sound bite which is so revealing. the first is the use of the term sensible. that s a democratic talking point approved by the dnc, sensible gun safety regulation. if you have john cornyn taking nancy pelosi s language. doing it on purpose. you hear him describe anybody who disagrees with him, why would you disagree? according to john cornyn, anybody is concerned about the politics of red flag laws. not the wisdom of red flag laws, not whether or not red flag laws or constitutional come up at grubby politics. in other words says john cornyn, everybody who disagrees with me is alone and unethical. if you are not used to eat hearing demagoguery like that, you should know john rob portman of ohio, north carolina, mitt romney of