Page 14 - Sergio Ramirez News Today

Advertisement Supreme Court Addresses Class Action Standing in Ramirez Case: Requires “Concrete” Injury for Article III Standing for Class Members Tuesday, July 13, 2021 TransUnion, LLC v. Ramirez , siding with credit reporting agency TransUnion in a 5-4 decision holding that thousands of consumers improperly flagged as potential terrorists do not have standing to sue the company for damages.  TransUnion expands upon  Spokeo, Inc. v. Robins, 2578 U.S. 330, 340 (2016) in limit...

Highlights The U.S. Supreme Court has upended a class damages award of $40 million under the Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA) against TransUnion, one of the "Big Three" credit reporting agencies. Reversing an earlier ruling by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, the Supreme Court held in a 5-4 decision that 6,332 of the 8,185 certified class members lack Article III standing because TransUnion did not disseminate their credit reports to third-party businesses during the relevant ti...

The three decisions announced Friday divided the justices into unusual groupings.

The statement demands the “international community’s condemnation of the actions of the Ortega-Murillo government” in Nicaragua

The decision in TransUnion LLC v. Ramirez may provide guidance on what risk of real harm means and may affect who can participate in class actions. Decision is likely to inform defense strategies in class action litigation against large companies and financial institutions.

Wekiva High School just put on a socially distanced production of “You’re a Good Man, Charlie Brown.”

Daniel Ortega, the Bard and the Elephant “All the world’s a stage, and all the men and women merely players. They have their exits and and their entrances; and one man in his time plays out many parts.” William Shakespeare. On occasion of the 3rd anniversary of students killed in demonstrations in April 2018 in Nicaragua, and disturbances following. For a teenager who asked me, “Who is Daniel Ortega?” Daniel Ortega has played more parts than even the English bard could have imagined....

To embed, copy and paste the code into your website or blog: The United States Supreme Court has repeatedly declined to resolve a question that has sharply divided the Circuits: whether a class may be certified even though it contains uninjured members. See e.g., Tyson Foods, Inc. v. Bouaphakeo et.al ., 136 S. Ct. 1036, 1050 (2016). On March 30, 2021, the Supreme Court heard argument on related issues in TransUnion LLC v. Ramirez, No. 20-297, a case with potentially significant implications ...

The US Supreme Court heard oral argument in TransUnion, LLC v. Ramirez 1 on Tuesday, March 30, 2021 on how absent class members establish standing in federal court. Standing is the first requisite for entry through the courthouse doors, yet reasonable minds differ on what this basic principle entails when considering the weight of absent class members who must stand with their representative as a collective. Switching focus to this specific representative, the question then became whether Rami...

Last week, the U.S. Supreme Court heard oral argument in TransUnion v. Ramirez, which poses significant questions about Article III standing and Rule 23’s typicality requirement for class certification. Ramirez will likely be one of the most consequential standing cases since Spokeo, Inc. v. Robins, affecting litigation involving violations of consumer protection statutes such as the Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA), the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA), and various states’ priva...