Maintain the capacity needed to meet the needs of our Young Children 05, this would include Facilities Development helping to make them safe and healthy as well as the development of our workforce. A system that prepares all children to be ready to learn when they go the kindergarten so they can have successful elementary educational experiences throughout their education through high school and for long life learning, a system thats equitable in termser of access and one that supports our most Vulnerable Children and their families and the centers that are in the Cross Cultural Family Center are located in many of these communities in our city and last and certainly not least is a system that values the professionals who work in our field of Early Education, our teachers, and gi garnering all of the resource that is are necessary to support equitable wages for our Early Childhood teachers, all of these are important as we move forward. Thank you. Thank you very much. Thank you for you
Facts of this case the Economic Situation are somewhat different that are ordinarily true in this industry because as handlers the hornes actually assumed the full financial responsibility for the raisins that were not turned over to the department of agricultural. The producers in this case were fully paid for their raisins. This is a factual finding to be found in the judicial officers opinion at 66 a of the appendix to the petition. The hornes paid the producers for their raisins corn to the judicial officer, those raisins became part of the inventory of the hornes. When the risen Administrative Committee which i will refer to as the r. A. C. Came after the raisins it was the hornes and the hornes only who bore the economic burden of this taking. I thought the growers were paid only for the volume that they were permitted that was permitted the permitted volume and that they were not paid for what goes in the reserve pool . Justice ginsburg that is true in the ordinary coarse. That
If you could finish your sentence. Id be happy to. The alternative proposed by the expert is to allow water levels in the lagoon system to rise a little bit in the spring and summertime. Doing this will have no impacts whatsoever on how often or the extent of flooding at the golf course because the golf course does not flood during the spring and the summer. It only floods during the winter rains when they are occurring. Were not talking about changing any management of those water levels. But in the spring and the summertime, they need to increase the amount of water they leave in the system. And if they do that, this Aquatic Vegetation will die off. It can only survive in very Shallow Water level. Simply by allowing that water level to rise, the vegetation will be killed, there will be no need to do this invasive construction process. The city will save probably a significant portion of the Million Dollar budget that they put forward for this project. And the Environmental Concerns t
Station of horse stable pond within the project description would result in significant environmental alteration of the threatened species habitat. [speaker not understood] the california red legged frog season would impact reproduction, drying leg masses, further decrease of the population. Not only will this activity be environmentally damaging, but it would require regular maintenance that would be costly. There is an alternative which is why water levels high enough to dry [speaker not understood]. This alternative addresses [speaker not understood] the current proposal lackseses. I am grateful for San Franciscos environmental leadership and believe we he should live up to this reputation by requiring [speaker not understood]. Thank you. Thank you. Next speaker. Hello, thank you for your time. My name is ron aloe michaels and im a resident of South San Francisco on the border of pacifica. I spend a good amount of time in San Francisco and have lived in this area for over three year
Does not flood during the spring and the summer. It only floods during the winter rains when they are occurring. Were not talking about changing any management of those water levels. But in the spring and the summertime, they need to increase the amount of water they leave in the system. And if they do that, this Aquatic Vegetation will die off. It can only survive in very Shallow Water level. Simply by allowing that water level to rise, the vegetation will be killed, there will be no need to do this invasive construction process. The city will save probably a significant portion of the Million Dollar budget that they put forward for this project. And the Environmental Concerns that we raised about acid sulfides and cumulative effects would go away. But never been willing to consider that alternative because they put together a mitigated negative declaration which was not required. The consideration of alternatives under law, instead of looking at this issue through a full blown Enviro