Parallel. In other words, we apply, but also run this through the various committees and have our decisions and if for some reason we decided we werent interested we would withdraw our application. Were not sure were still working on it and the feasibility of getting it in, but i think thats no problem of referring it to the committees. Do we have consensus about that . We will hear this in the committee, but the district will pursue this grant opportunity, paralleling our authorization process. Commissioner i dont have any reservations for applying for taking advantage of this opportunity, so i would assume move for a waiver on approval on First Reading if thats allowed. You would have to post that in the agenda and it wasnt posted in the agenda. Could we just bring it down for second reading at the meeting without it going to committee . A we we could do that and still hear it in committee. We could hear it in two weeks, but do you need to have direction now . I think i heard some di
Supporting the amendment. I think one of the toughest tasks the members have had has had to do with lay offs. Really just a terrible situation and so your first bull let bullet point, im very interested in seeing that change. I think if we think about the lay off process that weve had to go through in the past years, its very cruel and unusual punishment for or valuable assets so im interested in making this charter amendment. Commissioner [inaudible]. I had a question. Go ahead. Were you going to two questions. One, do we know who would introduce this next week . Ive had some discussion with supervisor kim and will be meeting with her tomorrow morning to go through the specific language. And the other question is really sort of where this proposal came from originally. I mean, so this idea that the restriction that we would only withdraw 30 percent in a particular year and was that our idea, was that brought to us by the mayors office. How did this particular structure evolve . We tal
Committees. Do we have consensus about that . We will hear this in the committee, but the district will pursue this grant opportunity, paralleling our authorization process. Commissioner i dont have any reservations for applying for taking advantage of this opportunity, so i would assume move for a waiver on approval on First Reading if thats allowed. You would have to post that in the agenda and it wasnt posted in the agenda. Could we just bring it down for second reading at the meeting without it going to committee . A we we could do that and still hear it in committee. We could hear it in two weeks, but do you need to have direction now . I think i heard some direction, which is that we could apply in parallel. The other thing is it would help if in two weeks we were doing it because we could refer to the application itself that it has been reads for a first time and its up for and being voted upon by our district. So it could be something we could add to the application if we knew
Through the task of identifying some specific edits or mark ups to propose at the committee whenever it takes place. And then as a part of our preparation process for input, it is along the lines of what youre informing us here and then the possible changes. They are this is an ongoing conversation but the last large bull et point regarding withdraws in your presentation, that is on ongoing conversation, or youre here to get the temperature of the board . These are concrete changes wed like to see and like you to take that forward and the board of supervisors as part of our preparation. Does that make sense . Yes. The legislation thats been drafted, which you have in your packet, that reflects everything thats on this page on page 6 and of the three options that are listed on page six, options for conditions for withdrawals, it reflects the first one of those. Continue to base the maximum draw on decline and inflation adjusted per people revenues, and one specific comment that commissi
Morning. Nobody wants to go back in time. We want to go forward. Step outside. That will cool you off. Especially in San Francisco. Temperatures are around 54 or 55 and 56. Some of the cool spots. Dry on live doppler 7 hd. You could terrorism into the clouds but they do not have as much moisture as you want. Most of us are dry during the commute. We have fog in the north bay and the coast. By the afternoon hours, 73 to 85 away the bay and 86 to 100 from the north bay to inland east bay and coast and San Francisco 64 to 70. We have a major delay systemwide on bart because of track work at mcarthur. Keep that in mind. We had track maintenance being done and an equipment problem so we are looking at major delays. Land ahead. If you need to have an alternate form of transportation i recommended you get going on that. You can see how clear it is at the bay bridge toll plaza. We do have a big clean up on our hands and this is in holster westbound highway 152, we have this issue with tomatoes