To go there says that we have already conclude and there is a benefit of it. And at that point,. And if i could clarify, just, to make sure that we have the common understanding of the facts. That the go Solar Program is a Program Statute did include a section that is a Pilot Program. That Pilot Program was for the first year. So that portion of the program that was characterized under the statute as pilot concluded. I think that we have come into the habit coming into it because the legislation was for ten years. So i think that perhaps, folks are thinking of ten years and that is the pilot aspect of it. And the aspect of the program has concluded that the program and the funding our capitol plan for ten years total. I think that you would come up. And that is a concern of mine is and so now, i clearly understand it and i appreciate that and i only have one last clarification. And once we start to rule out whatever we are going to rule out from this point forward, there is going to be
I think that we have come into the habit coming into it because the legislation was for ten years. So i think that perhaps, folks are thinking of ten years and that is the pilot aspect of it. And the aspect of the program has concluded that the program and the funding our capitol plan for ten years total. I think that you would come up. And that is a concern of mine is and so now, i clearly understand it and i appreciate that and i only have one last clarification. And once we start to rule out whatever we are going to rule out from this point forward, there is going to be conversation and there is going to be labor components and we did get it back on how we will let that out and that will also be ape subject of these discussions and am i right . That is correct. The whole idea behind this is to bring our stake holders in the room and come up where they process where we can do solar on our own customers. And in a way that is ininclusive of all of the stake holder in all of the advocat
Clarification. And once we start to rule out whatever we are going to rule out from this point forward, there is going to be conversation and there is going to be labor components and we did get it back on how we will let that out and that will also be ape subject of these discussions and am i right . That is correct. The whole idea behind this is to bring our stake holders in the room and come up where they process where we can do solar on our own customers. And in a way that is ininclusive of all of the stake holder in all of the advocates and so we need to sit down and have that conversation. Prior to engaging in any of the other agencies, and the pec conversation and it is not a conversation and we are not going to reach out to any other agency to get their take on it or opinions, and it will start here and here, and we may. Right . And so, you know, we are working with the department of environment and we are working with the solar, industry, we are working with the unions and we
Customer and that are governing agencies as well as private customers. And so just, it would be to make sure that that is cleaner maybe in in way, clearer. And our customers, because it is just as you are saying to open up the conversation. I think that it is as clear as it can be. At the moment. And it is focused on the customers as the exact phrase that it uses and i think that is pretty clear. But it is not clear and needs to be unclear at this point is the discussions between ourselves and the various Interest Groups as to exactly what we end up meaning by that. We dont have a inaudible program yet and it might look different if we do than if we dont, and so it cant be clear with respect to that. What we are really saying is that our objective is if we are spending money that benefits electric customers, they should be our customers. And i think that is pretty clear. And how that actually works itself out, and within the context of the Solar Program and that is something that the g
And this lake should be seen as a habitat primarily. And yes, like i said in the rational world, we would expect that rec and park could have the recreation and that would be done in harmony. That is not what we see in the park and other instances and so. I would concur, with your local Community Folks that live around that lake, that even though it can get unusual, it is really the sfpuc who has the expertise and showing the kind of commitment on the lands like this to actually manage them properly and so would i urge you to do everything and regardless of what you pass and i would urge you to do everything that he can to retain as much control over this situation as the sfpuc can get and that you put in rigid auditing power so that if smaoeg goes wrong you catch it fast and correct it fast and if necessary, pull back the responsibility of the commission of seeing this park to yourselves instead of rec and park that does not have a good record. I need five minutes to review the resolu