Their sources are anonymous to matter. When you report on current political battles its very hard to get people on the record because they dont want to lose their access to the people in power so i have developed over the course of many years during the books that i have written on Hillary Clinton, on barack obama in the last book i wrote was called the amateur, barack obama in the white house. I have a rolodex of sources to buy come to depend on who have proven to be absolutely accurate again and again and again and these people will talk to me for a variety of reasons not the least of which they like to see themselves as quite importance and close to power. But none of them will go on the record and understandably so. Host edward klein our guest to talk about his book blood feud takes a look at tensions between the clintons and the obama is. As i guess mentions also read a previous book about Hillary Clinton the kennedys and other topics pretty do want to ask them questions about thi
The common analogy is being invoked are the u. S. And china and the u. S. And russia. That is why i used the word tantalizing at the outset. This relationship has been marked by deep and recurring distrust on both sides and the result has been a breakdown in relations between the United States and iran that has lasted longer than the breakdown between china and the u. S. Today. Building trust is elusive particularly if one side doesnt understand what the other side thinks and why it does. That is the value of this book. I can think of no better person to explain the iranian viewpoint to a western audience than Seyed Hossain Mousavian who was not only at the center so many events that propelled the breakdown but it did his undergraduate studies in this country and who for the past five years has been doing research and teaching at princeton on the diplomacy of iran in United States. I can highly recommend this book and it is for sale at the door and i should tell you it has proven to be