he can get the border secure. if he does the border, i think he can do daca. if he only does daca and doesn t secure the border, i think that s going to be problematic for the president and his supporters. but i don t think that s what he is going to do. abby: that means democrats have to give something up. that s how you make a deal. you get something. you give something bad. where do democrats stand when it comes to border security? because if that is a place where they re going to give a little bit, what is their strategy? what is their plan. he needs to sit down with them and remind them that the republican have the majority in the house, the senate, and they have the white house. he is willing to give them something. he doesn t have to, but he is willing to give them something and he wants to give them something because he wants this to be something that all americans can embrace. but then he needs to play a little hard ball. look, in politics, i m sorry, but sometimes you have
we understand. but he said it after a lot of pressure from other republicans. even today he said and other hate groups. he left that wiggle room so people could interpret to whether it s black lives matter or people supporting black lives matter. this is what i m talking about. you never will be satisfied. you can t list every hate group in america. he doesn t have to. all he does is have to say the specific groups. and he did. he didn t have to say other hate groups. he doesn t speak with moral clarity when he talks about ken frazier or black lives matter. anybody he dislikes, he s very clear. when he talks about white supremacist or vladimir putin, he s not clear. he s clear to me. joe, joe. the message is clear to the kkk and knee on nazis as well. this is ridiculous. where do we go from here? we have a president that does not always speak with nuance, often does not speak with
obstruction of justice to me is of huge import in that we ve talked about trump aides. we ve talked about trump allies. we ve talked about former trump staff. who we ve never talked about in terms of being investigated is donald trump. we are now talking about that. that makes it fundamentally different. donald trump s reaction to this is his reaction to many things, which is dismiss, detract, move tell your story today, phony collusion with russia you said you made but so she doesn t have to. neither donald trump nor the white house took any issue with it. mark corralo, personal attorney for mark kasowitz, the leak s coming out. that s fine. a fair point but that has nothing to do with the detail of the story. i think it s wrong to say that this is jaw broad fishing expedition. no. they have to go broad before they go narrow.
i did not see any smoking gun with evidence to collusion. sean: there is many more like maxine waters and others. no evidence of collusion but the media is giddy because this thursday, the fired fbi director, the disgruntled now fbi director is going to testify in front of the senate intel community. comey is formally refusing to answer questions submitted to him by a bipartisan group of senators suggesting he no longer must do so. he doesn t have to. he s a private citizen. so was james comey is he adding fuel to the democrats conspiracy theories or is he joining a long list of officials who is saying there s no smoking gun evidence at all that president trump colluded with russia? joining us now, john solomon, sara carter. let me start with us. here s the problem comey has. comey the new york times
to obstruct justice? if it is a question of obstructing justice, that would be one thing. but he does have the authority to be able to remove mr. comey. yes. the reasoning behind this may very well play into other parts of an investigation. but the fact that he could terminate his employment and he could do it at will is i think pretty clear. what his motives are, unless it is part of another investigation, he doesn t have to give us his motives. but it might fit into the investigation. he doesn t have to, senator. but as you sit here this morning, are you satisfied with the motives he has put out, or do you think he needs to explain them more? i think in this particular case, we ll know more after the intelligence committee has their report. i think part of it is we can speculate about what it is and i know there is reporting going on right now, but let s wait and let the intelligence committee do their work. i think those questions will be