zimmerman, there s no way he s going to testify now. he doesn t have to. the jury has seen four or five interviews and each one is substantially similar. every witness was really an abomination. they were just horrible. they were unprepared, the information they gave to the jury not going to be believable. it s not credible, except for one witness, mr. good, the neighbor, who came out and testified unequivocally. he said trayvon martin was on top, zimmerman was below. he saw martin pounding him and here s a self-defense case. it s over, fred. they should never have charged second degree murder. it s really a sham and shows how politically motivated this prosecution was. avery, you just agree with everything that richard says. well, no, no, not everything. yeah. look it, the fact is, as prosecutors, you re stuck with what you got and indeed, there
say he s admitting, he can t even say he was in fear for his life right then. they will use that. however, forever you take it in context o mara under the rule of completeness will argue it s already in evidence, he will argue the rest of the statement, before that, he said, when were you in fear for your life? he said, when he was smashing my head on the concrete. clearly you can t quite p arks rrparse it out. clearly the prosecution is desperate. i don t think you will see george zimmerman on the stand. he doesn t have to. the self-defense claim has been put before the jury and now the state s burden to overcome it before a reasonable doubt. the state s burden not the defense s burden. the prosecution did that for them. they have given so much evidence helpful to the defense
this is a pot meet kettle moment. remember when he held up that magazine, illegal in the nbc studio in washington, d.c., yet he is trying to tell this guy he s aiding and abetting someone charged with espionage. with everything going on lately, not the position to take. this is an example of where being an absolutist is i think a flawed place to come from. i don t think it is wise. obviously david gregory looked incredibly foolish, especially with that hair. it was a bad question. however, greenwald has never done any prak through investigative journalism about our adversaries, he doesn t have to, he can do whatever he wants, shouldn t be prosecuted, but he was published in the guardian most hardcore, leftwing, anti-american newspaper you will find on the planet, and i think he is out of his depth now. the more that snowden pals
this is a pot meet kettle moment. remember when he held up that magazine, illegal in the nbc studio in washington, d.c., yet he is trying to tell this guy he s aiding and abetting someone charged with espionage. with everything going on lately, not the position to take. this is an example of where being an absolutist is i think a come from. i don t think it is wise. obviously david gregory looked incredibly foolish, especially with that hair. it was a bad question. however, greenwald has never done any prak through investigative journalism about our adversaries, he doesn t have to, he can do whatever he wants, shouldn t be prosecuted, but he was published in the guardian most hardcore, leftwing, anti-american newspaper you will find on the planet, and i think he is out of his depth now.
attention? are they coming after news is didn t know the answer. i didn t have to wait long. yeah, they re coming. neil: do you think these were rogue agents or district heads who decided to look after wealthy conservative groups and individuals like you, or do you suspect they were getting orders from higher up? i don t know. i mean, i don t know. neil: i find it out i remember that list when you popped up on it. i even told you, it was just a matter of time. he said his campaign said this about the eight of us. they had less than reputable records and had been on the wrong side of the law. none of that was true about me and i don t think it was true about any of us. my issue probably is, yeah, let s see if the irs targeted us because of that. did they seek us out because of the list? it came awful fast, one right after another after another. but i think the error was made when the president made the list. i don t think he said, go get em. he doesn t have to. he has an ar