Page 190 - Shouldn News Today

Famil amendment. >> i think he has the right and you shouldnt read anything into it. the reality is the public often reads something into it and i have a feeling donald trump would read something into it. its obviously going to be a big concern. look, i dont know all the details of whats going on here but, again, i would advise a client to take the fifth amendment without much concern if i thought there was a real problem if they testified. >> jack, lets talk about the presidents legal team. he ...

Their hat on. they should move on. >> what i dont understand, im not a lawyer. is why would rosenstein val volunteer that to president. he was not asked. is it to save his job? >> theres no requirement. >> or is it something he would to because he knew the president was concerned about it and shouldnt be? >> i think the guy will get rolled here. rod rosenstein the person who is a great character. high integrity. >> why -- >> i dont know. politics. that the three separate branchs are becoming the...

But prosecutors are pushing back on that idea, saying he hasnt gone rogue at all. why not just let him finish his job? >> well, listen, weve been all about him finishing his job. i believe that he should finish his job and get it done quickly. you know, even director comey said a year in to the investigation into hillary clinton, he believed that he had all the information he needed to either have a guilty or not guilty verdict. were past one year on this russia collusion narrative. i think he n...

>> mark: how -- how does the fourth amendment supply to someone who shouldnt even be in in the country that has the fourth amendment? because the way that the massachusetts court applied it, they were looking at the detention as an arrest. and its ends when the local jurisdiction releases them. and under this, their thinking, if you hold them again for another 48 hours, which is what detainers do, that constitutes a second arrest, and therefore, thats where you would have fourth amendment concer...

Is there a strategy here, a weird signal thats being sent by trump friends to motorcycle about what he should or shouldnt do? >> you know, again, i dont know, i dont know what kind of strategy they are trying to signal there. i suppose people are trying to warn the president and others that if michael cohen is already cooperating to be careful in your phone conversations with him. at this stage, when the investigation is over and everybody knows that michael cohen is under investigation i would ...

Clear. the second was like we made a mistake, this is wrong we want to make amendments. but your values shouldnt come in response to protests and confrontation. i think thats where starbucks made a misstep.im hopeful about the trainings. but again, thats over 100,000 people getting trained all in one day is a lot of could be tent. >> thats a big task here. >> yeah, and we have never seen that happen well. >> brian with united there was a mess after they ejected the guy of to. init was the fourth...

Walking around with no criminal consequences. this is very damaging for our system of law and this is something we should take seriously. >> lying to a federal investigator for any of us is big trouble in the criminal violation. the report is not superlong but it is interesting, get the facts for yourself and make your own decisions. great to have you with us weighing in tonight. neil gorsuch is making history, he hired the first native american clerk to the high court. she is an enrolled citize...

Through the documents, either a filter team, which the government wants here, or a special master, or a judicial officer. it is right here in the u.s. attorneys manual but the government doesnt want to do it, the special master, doesnt want to do a judicial officer. by god, in the case of lynne stewart, the attorney who was convicted of aiding and abetting a terrorist, even she got a special master but the president of the united states doesnt get one. so i think it is really striking. and i agr...

Nation. what do you think follows from this? >> i think the impact long term will probably be minimal. thats not to say that the strike was wrong or shouldnt have been done. it is simply to say the strike itself was targeted for a reason. simply to make a statement to syria and russia, its supporter, that a particular use of a weapon, chemical weapons against a civilian population would not be targeted. does this mean that we in the united states or even the west has a long-term syria policy? no...

Russia said its keeping a close eye on the fleet and the kremlin hit out a trumps handling of the situation. we do not participate in twitter diplomacy we support a serious approach we still believe that it is important not to take any steps that may harm the already fragile situation in syria we are also still convinced that the excuse regarding the use of chemical weapons in duma is made up and cannot be used as an argument for military action russia has moved fast to establish itself in duma ...