Low and mid40s around cupertino and santa clara. A little bit of fog in southern california. It is trying trying. Well, it is june, so it is trying to work its way up the coast and it runs into an off shore breeze somewhere around morro bay and then disintegrates. 30s, 40s, 50s to almost 60 degrees. Big spreads on the temps. Any way you look at it, High Pressure will give us a warm day. Last rain was january 25th. Were 15 days of dry weather. Eventually that will reach 20. Some hints around the 20th. More on that coming up later. Highs today all in the 70s. Here is sal. 7 01. What do you have . We have a problem in San Francisco where a crash is blocking two lanes on southbound 101 right after the cesar chavez exit. Traffic is stacking up. Before too long, this will affect the bay bridge commute from San Francisco. I think it already is doing that. You can look at the traffic here and the traffic here that is not moving along well on westbound 80 driving out towards the metering lights
You would bifurcate the complaint and handle the one as improper governmental activities and the other parts a sunshine violation. But i just want to be sure that people have enough information to go on the sunshine complaint, but you wouldnt necessarily reveal who the underlying complainant was. You would necessarily have to reveal who the respondent was. Its an interesting point. Sorry. I wonder what the staff thinks on that . Because the staff cant initiate a complaint either on its own awareness or it can say we heard about it from x, but were going to erase x and issue a complaint . First of all were bound by the Confidentiality Provisions so we would be very careful to make sure nothing that would be considered confidential was disclosed. We also would have the opportunity to file on behalf of somebody or staffinitiated, then its staff versus public official x. So the original complainant would be hidden or masked in that sense. I have no quarrel with that and just wanted to anti
Submitted to you in december. With many iterations even after that. I went back and sortof looked at the number of meetings that i had attended for this project and it actually was over 120 task force and Community Meeting and whoever said it was 100 meetings was wrong it was more than that it was actually closer to 150. So, you know what you have on the screen are some of the key objectives that we pulled out but if i were to summarize it as a domier and what i heard the task force say and what i try to live by is the notion that we needed to respect who came before us, particularly as it related to uses on the ground and also the ally system but i also think hat task force recognized that the area isnt perfect and especially in the areas of open space and certain other elements with respect to pedestrian satisfactory and the treatment of the pedestrianian specially on some of the major affairs and harrison there is more work to be done and i think what they tried to do is capture a l
About how to conduct the matter going forward. That is a good point. So i wonder if that is taken care of by the fact that relates to the merits of the complaint and excludes scheduling. Right. So perhaps, yes. So perhaps that is anticipated . Yes. Okay. This is very fussy. I hate editing as a group, but except for communications generally and committed between a court and party, communications are not typically committed. Odd raiding. Conducted . That would be better. The sort of thing we caught count on mr. Renne for. Any other proposed changes to chapter 4 . Public comment . Im still richard knee. In the previous draft of the Decision Points, there was a provision declaring that the commission would not be required to televise portions of its meetings held in closed session or otherwise required to be confidential. Unless its escape my eyeballs the current draft does not contain that language and i would like to see the subject reintroduced, but i suggest that the commission require
Count on mr. Renne for. Any other proposed changes to chapter 4 . Public comment . Im still richard knee. In the previous draft of the Decision Points, there was a provision declaring that the commission would not be required to televise portions of its meetings held in closed session or otherwise required to be confidential. Unless its escape my eyeballs the current draft does not contain that language and i would like to see the subject reintroduced, but i suggest that the commission require audio and or video recordings of all such sessions with the recordings to be made available for inhall camera review as to whether questions arise of incould have hail discussions or acs have taken place during those closed sessions . X and im still generally david pillpa and generally committed or should be. [ laughter ] let me go to item b, without complicating this section, unnecessarily, we have seen complaints about investigative files. I dont know how explicit this particular document shoul