affair with donald trump 12 years ago. he and he alone, not on behalf of his client donald trump or the trump organization. this morning michael avenatti released e-mails written to and from michael cohen s corporate e-mail address, even including his corporate signature block at the bottom. tonight mr. avenatti released an additional e-mail referring to yom kippur and the office being closed, raising questions about why the office being open or closed would be relevant if cohen were truly handling this transaction as he claims all on his own. on top of that, there s a question of why cohen s bank flagged a $130,000 payment as suspicious enough to report it to federal authorities to file what s called a s.a.r., a suspicious activity report. i asked michael avenatti about it in our last hour. what we know from the prior reporting in this case is that at some point after the date of this transaction in late 2016, first republic bank prepared a s.a.r., a suspicious activity report, rela
producing another e-mail that he says refutes a key claim by president trump s personal lawyer michael coyen that in the closing weeks of the com pain he personally paid daniels. he and he alone, not on behalf of his client, donald trump, or the trump organization. this morning michael avenatti released e-mails written to and from michael cohen s corporate e-mail address, even including his corporate signature block at the bottom. tonight mr. avenatti released an additional e-mail referring to yom kippur and the office being closed, raising questions about why the office being open or closed would be relevant if cohen were truly handling this transaction as he claims all on his own. on top of that, there s question of why cohen s bank flagged the payment as suspicious enough to report it to federal authorities to file what s called an s.a.r., a suspicious activity report. i asked mike al avenatti mr. it in our last hour. what we know from the prior reporting in this case is that at s
that apparently caused her no distress at a time that was 18 years closer to the alleged assault. yet 18 years later while talking before the cameras about the supposed assault, shere seemingy could not contain her emotions. my signature on the order of dismissal in the divorce case was annotated with the letters d and a representing the initials of my court assistant. curiously, the supposed yearbook inscription is also followed by the same initials. but at the time, i was a deputy district attorney, not a district attorney. those initials as well as the date under the signature block and a printed name of the restaurant are written in a style inconsistent with the rest of the yearbook inscription. the seven and christmas, 1977 are in a notably different script than the sevens in the date 12-22-77. i believe tampering has occurred. are we had a stage in american politics in which false allegations can overcome a
that apparently caused her no distress at a time that was 18 years closer to the alleged assault. yet 18 years later while talking before the cameras about the supposed assault, she seemingly could not contain her emotions. my signature on the order of dismissal in the divorce case was annotated with the letters d and a representing the initials of my court assistant. curiously, the supported yearbook inscription is also followed by the same initials. but at the time, i was a deputy district attorney, not a district attorney. those initials as well as the date under the signature block and a printed name of the restaurant are written in a style and consistent with the rest of the yearbook inscription. the seven and christmas, 1977 are in a notably different script than the sevens in the date 12-22-27. i believe chamfering has occurred. are we had a stage in american politics in which false allegations can overcome a
the uranium one the deal without looking into the clinton foundation, filling out the slips, with millions of dollars in donations from the russian. so that appears to be the challenge. and we certainly cannot link to mr. rosenstein, because it is rosenstein s name on the signature block, stealing from congress and the american people, the very testimony ready to tell us about the bribes. laura: what do you make of the old obama until she s coming out yesterday? and you know, and various ways, various interviews recently, coming out and criticizing trump on his comments about putin and so forth. given the fact that we know that each of them have their own credibility issues and testifying before congress. i also think it is interesting, go back to the january sixth at 2017 that comey had with a trumpet, that he briefed him on the dossier. and shortly thereafter, someone leaks the fact that that took