reasoning of what the news that we heard about pence, so i m just not going to comment from here. i m not going to comment on any other former elected official, current elected official, i refer you to the department of justice, anything that relates to this white house, i would refer you to the office. the abrams tank, john kirby says it s expensive to maintain, operate, fuel, and requires a lot of training. does this white house still have those same concerns when it comes to providing tanks to the ukrainians? as my dod colleagues have said very recently that again, nothing to preview from here, certainly don t have anything to share, but they never ruled out tanks, just want to make that very clear. i think what my colleagues at the dod have said in the past and recently is that there were always challenges with tanks, but not going to preview anything. i think i would refer you to the dod comments on this. always been challenges, never been taken off the table. i don
we are not making statements from the white house podium by theory about who should investigate and who should not and who has been found. they want to make sure that they come out of the woods alive. sandra: let me ask you the question. should former elected officials take care in checking for classified documents, juan? obviously. john: this is not like a legal opinion this is a policy thing, david, do you think it should be good policy to check to see whether they have classified documents, simple yes or no. simple terms a c student from shepard university would understand, my alma mater. should you follow the law or not follow the law? that is a question any american should be able to answer whether you are under investigation or not. yes, you should follow the law. the contrary point, though, is that what if you ve done so inadvertently. that s president biden s position. i don t think president trump but what if you say yes, some