Page 51 - Sixth Amendment News Today

The Mercury provides news and fun every single day—but your help is essential. If you believe Portland benefits from smart, local journalism and arts coverage, please consider making a small monthly contribution, because without you, there is no us. Thanks for your support! GOOD MORNING, PORTLAND! And hey! You need some hearty laughs this week, right? Then get your tickets NOW for the absolutely hilarious interactive live game show, TWO EVILS with Arlo Weierhauser and...

A federal judge in Oregon ordered all criminal defendants in the state to be released seven days after their initial hearing if they aren't able to secure a lawyer for their case going forward.

The order will take effect Nov. 16, impacting both those currently in custody and future unrepresented defendants in Oregon.

A federal judge has ordered Oregon counties to release criminal defendants from jail if they aren’t appointed an attorney within a week of their first court appearance. In his Thursday ruling, U.S. District Judge Michael McShane says indigent defendants are essentially being locked up and deprived of a voice simply because they are too poor to hire their own lawyer. Oregon is one of many states that have struggled to ensure their public defense systems meet the requirements of the Sixth Amendm...

If you were to dream up a hypothetical case that demanded cameras in federal courts, it would be United States of America v. Donald J. Trump. Every American voter will have a unique and pressing interest in watching the federal government present evidence next March that the former president and current Republican frontrunner for the next election tried to overturn the last election.

If you were to dream up a hypothetical case that demanded cameras in federal courts, it would be United States of America v. Donald J. Trump. Every American voter will have a unique and pressing interest in watching the federal government present evidence next March that the former president and current Republican frontrunner for the next election tried to overturn the last election.

If you were to dream up a hypothetical case that demanded cameras in federal courts, it would be United States of America v. Donald J. Trump. Every American voter will have a unique and pressing interest in watching the federal government present evidence next March that the former president and current Republican frontrunner for the next election tried to overturn the last election.

The NAACP analyzed data on racial or ethnic diversity of juries in Iowa counties with large Black or Latino populations.

Nominal Index [Citations: 2023 LiveLaw (SC) 932-953]Indrakunwar v. State of Chattisgarh 2023 LiveLaw (SC) 932Manish Sisodia v. Central Bureau of Investigation 2023 LiveLaw (SC) 934Bhisham Lal Verma V....

The ACLU argues the gag order violates Trump's First Amendment rights and the public's right to hear Trump's views so they can decide "whether he deserves to be elected again."