Page 27 - Slaughtering News Today

Earth. they want to kill israelis, they want to kill americans. its a simple math equation, a squared +b squared equals c squared. you have the caliphate, and you marry that with nuclear weapons, that could mean a potential modern-day nuclear holocaust the likes of which we have never seen. if you doubt that, look at the last century alone. lets see, fascism, communism, nazism, stalinism, japan, slaughtering in the last country, it can happen again, al happen again if we do not act now. you cann...

Title of the hunt was red state versus blue state and one of the characters says nothing better than going after the manner and slaughtering of dozen deplorables, we have not seen the movie nor read the screen so independently confirmed the line about deplorables was in the movie, what we have seen is one of the trailers released by universal in which two characters talk about the right of wealthy one percenters to hunt the well off. >> we pay for everything. this country belongs to us. >> haunt...

"the new york times" apparently covered it. "the new york times" barely covered the holocaust. "the new york times" is owned by a jewish family. it barely covered the holocaust because mr. sollaceberger decided he didnt want his newspaper to be seen as sort of a jewish newspaper. he wanted the newspaper to be more of a universal newspaper. fdr didnt want to focus on the holocaust. so "the new york times" comply. they wouldnt accept evidence that was coming, being printed in european publications...

Others are slaughtered. "the new york times" apparently covered it.. "the new york times" barely covered the holocaust. "the new york times" is owned by a jewish family. it barely covered the holocaust because mr. sollaceberger decided he didnt want his newspaper to be seen as sort of a jewish newspaper. he wanted the newspaper to be more of a universal newspaper. fdr didnt want to focus on the holocaust. so "the new york times" comply. they wouldnt accept evidence that was coming, being printed...

"the new york times" apparently covered it. "the new york times" barely covered the holocaust. "the new york times" is owned by a jewish family. it barely covered the holocaust because mr. sollaceberger decided he didnt want his newspaper to be seen as sort of a jewish newspaper. he wanted the newspaper to be more of a universal newspaper. fdr didnt want to focus on the holocaust. so "the new york times" comply. they wouldnt accept evidence that was coming, being printed in european publications...

And slaughtering them to death, they had a correspondent in moscow, they got a pulitzer prize for the reporting, covered up what stalin had committed against the ukraine. this is "the new york times," can any other in the business survive that. all of the news fit to print. "the new york times" still hadnt significantly and seriously dealt with this. it keeps the pulitzer prize. two massive genocides in the last century. you dont find a lot about it in the pages of "the new york times" at the ti...

Acts of great barbarism. >> the massacre of the innocents is not historical but what it does for matthew, it makes jesus look like a new moses. in the old testament, pharaoh tries to kill baby moses by slaughtering all of the hebrew children. matthew, by sharing herod slaughtering all this children in bethlehem is sharing that jesus is like moses, and herod is like the pharaoh. >> so who is the true king herod? and can history and archaeology reveal the man behind the myth? oh! oh! ♪ ozempic®...

But yet it is crazy if you listen to the media. >> that is absolutely right. but another question about gun control and reducing the crime keep in mind guns are in adamant objects it could be there for a century it will not do anything that people that are arguing for gun control as a way to reduce the slaughtering that we see in the united states 30 people are killed each day by drunk drivers in our country so do you want to have car control? it turns out rifles and shotguns are used to kill 56...

In your book you write there seems to be so much violence in the house and senate chambers in the 1830s, 1840s, and 1850s, shoving, punching, bowie knives. congressman brawling in the benches while colleagues stood on chairs to get a good look. and at at least once a gun was fired on the house floor. historically they have been demonstrated, that violence has been demonstrated at our highest levels of governance. >> context matters. the united states in the 1840s and 1850s was a really violent c...

"the muslims announced that they would have a celebration by slaughtering and cooking the soldiers and people." though clear evidence shows it was the rohingya who were the main victims of slaughter, ten rohingya men were hacked and shot to death by myanmar soldiers, a massacre the military has admitted to and that two reuters journalists were jailed for investigating. the u.n. says many more men, women, and children were sava savagely killed here, as well. the trip then continues through a barr...