Page 21 - Sleeper Cell News Today

Necessarily mean al-qaeda or taliban, but given the claimdit of credit early on, thats the direction the authorities would be looking.e? true?reg, >> yes. what we are hearing is the suggestion that there may havetr been some support mechanismtecha here in the u.s. so was he acting on his own? apparently not is what we are picking up now.se ithe apparently there is something else in the water, and that ofr, course raises the threat ofrt some sort of sleeper cell. i dont think from what we know so...

>> larry: one more question for deborah feyerick in new york.any possibility, any word yet about an international connection to this? >> well, you know, larry, that is what some of our counterterrorism folks are telling us in washington. they are investigating now, the focus of the investigation shifting overseas to see whether, in fact this person or people involved in this attempted attack, whether they traveled overseas whether they communicated, did they have any sort of ties to any radical ...

Necessarily mean al qaeda or taliban. but given the claim of credit early on, clearly, thats a direction that authorities would be looking. true? >> reporter: yeah. which i think, greg, what we are hearing from the washington post report is the suggestion that there may have been been some support mechanism here in the u.s. so was shahzad faisal acting on his own? apparently not is what we are picking up now. apparently, there is something else in the water. and that, of course, raises the threa...

>> larry: one more question for deborah feyerick in new york.any possibility, any word yet about an international connection to this? >> well, you know, larry, that is what some of our counterterrorism folks are telling us in washington. they are investigating now, the focus of the investigation shifting overseas to see whether, in fact this person or people involved in this attempted attack, whether they traveled overseas whether they communicated, did they have any sort of ties to any radical ...

Connect to the taliban, wouldnt he get out immediately? to wait a day, 24 or 48 hours technically, wouldnt he have gotten out sooner? he has to know that jfk airport, of all airports, there would be advanced security there? >> reporter: you are exactly right. that being a real center, thats an excellent point. good point. that is a center of international travel in all the united states. but this raises a troubling question in my mind: could it be then that he had protection? here in the united ...

Was okay for him to have a cigarette. to make matters worse, when confronted, law enforcement sources say the diplomat made an offhand joke that included a reference to a shoe bomb. not funny. fighter jets were scrambled. denver and other airports were put on alert. in a moment well show you how all this played out and how you will probably end up paying for it. mohammed al madadi has diplomatic immunity. it was all a misunderstanding. now add this in. he was flying west to visit a man in prison...

Advocated for terrorist detainees. who are these government officials? eric holder will only name two. why the secrecy behind the other seven? whose values do they share? tell eric holder, americans have a right to know the identity of the al qaeda seven. >> scary, right? lawyers who represent guantanamo prisoners are essentially terrorists themselves. they are terrorist sympathizers at least. thanks to intrepid reporting by the fox news channel naturally, we now know the identities of the al qa...

For people in prison. these seven lawyers, including the two we already knew about, theyre like a sleeper cell inside the justice department. i mean, theyve defended people suspected of terrorism. so theyre sort of suspected of terrorism too, right? they defended people accused of terrorism, so that means they sort of were defending terrorism, sort of. and it turns out that this is way bigger than just nine justice department attorneys who liz cheney has ferreted out as al qaeda simps. 34 of the...

Latest updates on this topic.

Your a traitor a sleeper cell for an enemy what do you say to that? honestly. thats not the beginning of a conversation. that is being -- thats a call for violence. >> look, tucker, i practice criminal defense every day. people accuse their client under everything under the sun in the indictment. you argue back your point. >> tucker: you said that -- >> hes not getting his messaging out. when you leave this vacuum, thats when -- >> tucker: are you being serious? again, i -- whatever. i dont care...