that civil servant would be bored to tears with my list. let pe get your reaction. when it comes to the supreme court, 1979, smith vs. maryland regarding the 4th amendment and search and seizures, the supreme court, you know, has held that there is no legitimate expectation of privacy for phone records that are held by a third party which can be seized without a warrant. again, that for the meta, not for the content. my question to you is when a lot of people hear of what s going on, they hear it s meta, they sort of think, that s a slippery sloan, ain t it? is it? well, it is a slippery slope. i don t want people to accept that meta data is not sensitive. it s intn settled. that s been settled. right there. case in 79 sugged if something is held by a 3rd pare, it can be accessed without a warrant. no, but again, that was a case involving a discreet amount of information about a
some of the vitriolic stuff and most of the question and answer with both the democrats and republicans looked at well, dr. jasper, what do you mean about political islam and what s the slippery sloan and discussed with them as prime minister cameron he wieloquent britain, many imams say they re not identifying with who they are and separated that the islamic state is better than the west. than americans and westerners are not equal to them. imam al-awlaki, he was in the exactly preaching love and one of the things i found fascinating from your testimony. muslims in some corners of the united states don t believe in a separation of church and state and what america is founded on and they don t understand that as well, do