this is the country of georgia and we were covering that and the guy running the voting system making up claims like this and having this conflict of interest, we would have no hesitation calling that out as banana republic stuff. that is but this is happening in our country. listen, mark, they are calling it a stunt, the democrats. do they have a right to call this a stunt? we have how about this? we have a right to know the facts right now and haven t seen anything from the secretary of state other than this initial we re looking into it statement beyond that. we deserve the facts. at some point perhaps the governor himself needs to step in. i get it. he s republican. not necessarily going to be on the side of stacy abrams and doesn t want to embarrass the republican nominee. when you have the secretary of state s office say 48 hours before election day, i mean, it seems a little bit mirky. i want to play stacy abrams, what she told cnn tonight.
contact with the woman accused of murdering her daughter. shannon would look at me with this little smirky look on her face. she s very cocky, like she knew she was going to get off. no remorse. she didn t feel she had done anything. they had only been engaged for two months. reporter: assistant d.a. david saacks, an experienced, savvy prosecutor, would now square off against a younger court-appointed defense attorney named scott holmes. it s important, i think, to try to see the world, try to see the world from the eyes of shannon on the days that led up to and the day that this happened. the whole trial was basically us saying that shannon crawley committed this murder and the defense saying jermeir stroud did this murder. that was basically the trial. reporter: detective shawn pate worried shannon crawley could walk. after all, the case against her was largely circumstantial. her dna was not at the crime
to rate people on all sorts of criteria whether there s legacies, athletes, gender, race, ethnicity, personality, but the fact remains that there s this law and there s been the whole series of supreme court cases trying to figure out whether admission should be race neutral or race conscious in admissions. paul: but if they can show, the court, bill, that race is just a factor, just one of many, not the decisive factor and the supreme court has said, some with ambiguous fashion, you can t make race the decisive factor, they might prevail? they might although i think and supreme court rulings going back to alan have been mirky thing, can be a factor but don t draw lines where. this might be harder, with gap of sat scores so much blatant.
to rate people on all sorts of criteria whether there s legacies, athletes, gender, race, ethnicity, personality, but the fact remains that there s this law and there s been the whole series of supreme court cases trying to figure out whether admission should be race neutral or race conscious in admissions. paul: but if they can show, the court, bill, that race is just a factor, just one of many, not the decisive factor and the supreme court has said, some with ambiguous fashion, you can t make race the decisive factor, they might prevail? they might although i think and supreme court rulings going back to alan have been mirky thing, can be a factor but don t draw lines where. this might be harder, with gap of sat scores so much blatant.
are a large number of people who don t have an image. i m not some crazy communist. i m a pretty normal guy. ted cruz thinks he s a great debater but he doesn t wajt to win, if you want to put it that way. a single public debate in 20 debates he was in, when he gets on the stage he gets smirky, he didn t win any of those debates. so the question is can he control himself enough? can he sublimate enough to beto o rourke enough to stay on that stage? i think beto should talk about the possibility of his father s involvement in the jfk assassination for an hour. thank you both. if you have a three day