debate, more ideas would break loose, because the third party person would be a rogue and not so scripted and make for more interesting dialogue. well, for the sake of the argument, the money is driving out the third party candidates and it is going on the list of unintended on the citizens united marks is that whether facts have been changed or come to be seen so differently, and earlier in the year justice ginsberg issued a snippet opinion to justice breyer saying some unintended consequences here that may affect citizens united and goes with shadowy billionaires as room for modifying the contour of the campaign. and i love it, sugar daddies and buddy roemer might get us a revisiting of the citizens united issue. and thank you, panel.