the same thing for these little snippets of name-calling that donald trump now claimed should have been admitted against miss carroll. and, michelle, donald trump complained tonight on cnn that the access hollywood video was allowed to be an exhibit in the case, and never was pointed out on cnn that it was allowed to be an exhibit because it was a confession in donald trump s own voice to precisely the kind of crime he committed against e. jean carroll. right, and i think that was very clear in this trial, not just e. jean carroll, but the two other woman who testified that donald trump had assaulted them, jessica leads, and natasha i mean, that s why the access hollywood tape was so powerful. a lot of us have a vague memory of it. but the extent to which he outlined and ammo, that he had
if you listen to donald trump, they have adjectives. they have adverbs, they have epithets. we one of the things we can do better is george santos could say i m going to prove acts, or innocent. but what are the facts? what is it that makes these allegations erroneous? presumably, he knows. he hasn t shared any of that yet. exactly. these snippets are fine. but one of the ways to sort of get at this is to really say, okay, let s go through let s get into the weeds. you re saying campaign fraud, let s talk about the email you sent. are you saying that all of them money was spent on campaign
trump not only sexually assaulted miss carroll, but defamed her. so, he has, that juror was there all the way through, despite exposure to right-wing tv. now, on top of that, donald trump today complained on cnn, or this evening on cnn, that all kinds of evidence came in, were excluded for miss carroll. the nicknames for her husband, the nicknames for her dog, other prejudicial evidence. but that kind of name-calling was late in on trump s side, the names he s called people, the number of prejudicial statements his name, the jury would still be in the box now. we are committed to keeping out irrelevant evidence. there is no testimony in this case, other than the fact that donald trump is under indictment. there was no testimony in this case that he s still under investigation, that he s known to have cheated on his staffers, all of those things income and because they were irrelevant, and unfair in this trial, which was not about those things. the same thing for these little snippets o
donald trump is coming to an end. authorities attorneys, i should say, for both sides, making their closing arguments today as the jury prepares to take up deliberations tomorrow. cnn is tracking all of it for us. she s just outside the courthouse in new york. walk us through the closing arguments as this case gets ready to head to the jury. reporter: it began the day began with e. jean carroll s attorneys doing their closing arguments first and what carroll s lawyer told the jury was that donald trump was a no-show, they focused on the fact that he did not show up to face these allegations, that he did not testify in this case. and they said that the only way that the jury heard from trump was in the video deposition. and in that deposition they said trump was actually a witness against himself. they pointed to the snippets of the deposition and replayed them for the jury where trump is looking at a black and white photo of him and carroll several years before the alleged assaul
micro he told fellow former cia boss john brennan in an oct october 19th, 2020 e-mail, that he was trying to give the biden 2020 political campaign some ammunition to push back on trum during the upcoming debate nanc urged brandon to sign on to the letter that was basically calling the hunter biden laptop possible russian disinformation. now, here are some snippets in that e-mail. cocaine and you need to this list, this is morel to brennan. opal trying to get the campaign particularly during the debate, it talking points to push back on trump on this issue. responded opal to michael, and mining to the list. good initiative thanks for asking me to sign on. now, still while all this is happening but there are obviously many questions swirling about the laptop. the countries of the laptop angle possible pay for play allegation against the biden family. meantime a lawyer for some of those intel officials who signe onto that infamous letter, well he is talking to fox news that and he sai