Page 4 - So Avery News Today

For negligence and they have the option to sue in germany, because most of the people -- passengers were german. there is some french law, and because it happened in france criminally speaking thats the sole jurisdiction. but from everything weve seen t does not appear there is going to be any criminal prosecution. but civilly, they would have to prove that the airline was negligent and as a result of the airlines negligence people died. when there is crumpled up and ripped up notes in the pilot...

Killed them all, of course. >> lets bring in our legal guy, freeman and civil rights attorney and law professor in new york this week and richard herman and law professor from las vegas. good to see both of you. >> good to see you, fredricka. >> so avery, you first. do those muttered remarks by durst, spoke into a hot mic, neutralize two-party consent rule in california? >> well thats a rule in california where both parties have to consent. i dont think it applies at all. the fact is its an unfe...

When it is lifted that night. a resident calls 911, the suspect is hiding in his boat. >> hes got a snipers rifle pointed right at his head because he was still a threat. >> he was still a threat. >> reporter: after an intent standoff tsarnaev surrenders. hes read his rights. deborah feyerick cnn, boston. >> federal prosecutors say they will seek the death penalty. lets bring in civil prosecutor good to sigh. and joining us from hawaii aloha to you. there you go. all right. lets talk about what ...

It is hopeful that we wont see something like this in the future. unfortunately, i think we will. >> all right. avery, richard, thanks so much for your input. and of course, thank you for all the incredible work that you do every weekend, all year long, with your insight, with your expertise, with your intelligence and opening our eyes to fascinating cases and opening our eyes to looking at cases different ways. thanks so much for all that you bring. >> thank you. >> better things coming up for ...

Supreme court review. here there was a presidential commission also established by president obama who, in the end, said you know, probably it violates the fourth amendment, but were not real sure. we dont want to go there quite yet. theres a split in the country and the supreme court is is going to ultimately have to decide abo decide. avery, does this case have all the criteria that would, you know, satisfy the supreme court to even want to tackle a case like this? >> well, i think there are g...

Promises. this verdict had to be the verdict that came down, fred. it couldnt come any other way with the evidence that was presented in this case. it just could not. and the media coverage went crazy with it because nobody really sat and watched all of the evidence and analyzed all of the testimony. had you done that, you would have realized it had to be a not guilty verdict based on the evidence that they had. maybe the prosecution shouldnt have been brought, angela was brought in to rush this...

Will go. we dont have comment from the jewish hospital in cincinnati. i am sure the jasper family will be hearing from the hospital by way of their attorneys. all right. thanks so much. avery and joey, good to see you this saturday. thanks so much. catch our brilliant legal minds every saturday about this time. thanks so much. all right. sony launching a new playstation this week. lots of people rushed to get their hands on it, but competition is on the way. well tell you how soon. ♪ (train ...

Casey kasem, 81 years old, suffering from parkinsons disease. his daughter has been trying to get temporary conservatorship. she says her fathers wife, jean kasem, wont let her and her siblings see their father, much less make decisions about his medical care. the judge says there is no urgent need for him to get any kind of intervention in this case. jean kasems attorney telling us, quote, the courts refusal to appoint a conservator validates the care being provided by his wife jean during this...

>> so avery, if were talking about seating a new jury, if it does proceed and season the case that the family and the judge making a decision, but instead there is a new jury seated, are we talking about revisiting testimony? not just the character witnesses of travis alexander or to even jodi arias herself delivering another statement, but were talking about revisiting some of the trial testimony because with a new jury seated, dont they have to have a clear understanding of why the conviction ...

Didnt know. so you know, thats the one. area -- >> that has nothing to do with white house. >> no. im not saying the white house. im talking about the issue here. >> maybe hes going to face contempt of congress. well see. nothing to do with white house. >> theres another issue that i guess is being invited to be part of the process of scandals as related to the white house. were talking about the federal shield law to be reintroduced to the senate. the president wanting that. hes asking for that...