Page 63 - Something Wrong News Today

It adds to the evidence that reason the white house backedau extorting ukraine was not some second thought or some attempt to avoid doing something wrong, but rather as so many have stated, they backed off because they got caught. they wanted a damage-control mode. the "new york times" reporting on the developmentings. its part of a larger effort to avoid, according to reports, the trump aids wanting any part of the plot being exposed. an echo of what looks like an odd denial that he didnt want ...

Trump did something wrong, the only problem he did not collude, our campaign did not, we finally saw that they tried to block brett kavanaugh for being the next supreme court justice and finally they had to given and can see he was indeed qualified to be there and i were out of russia to plano, the ukrainian hoax, the non-coup against the president that they are trying to manifest as impeachment which is so crazy and everybody knows that it is complete nonsense and we have this book, you are rig...

And he -- he could not get elected share of the dnc a year ago, i dont think he is ready for treatment. elizabeth warren, my god, i think that any john f kennedy democrat is scared, when swrurger ber zuckerberg is scared that and i problem. >> is anyone impressing. >> you no, that is why joe biden is leading the pack because you have such a hopeless group of candidates, that is sad but great for the khant country thas that donald trump will be president. >> he will run circles around whoever the...

He run the small town. and he -- he could not get elected share of the dnc a year ago, i dont think he is ready for treatment. elizabeth warren, my god, i think that any john f kennedy democrat is scared, when swrurger ber zuckerberg is scared that and i problem. >> is anyone impressing. >> you no, that is why joe biden is leading the pack because you have such a hopeless group of candidates, that is sad but great for the khant country thas that donald trump will be president. >> he will run cir...

Weird way they an ominous book actually helps make an argument that you and i have been making for a long time and its all connected and its all part of the same thing which is the establishment tried to reject and undermine and obstruct a blocker president. they boys hated in attacking their policy ideas who is delivering results along those lines and they cannot stand it. we had the book in the impeachment is all the same thing. >> we have been trying to get donald trump out of the white house...

So, where the process has a foregone conclusion, is there a better resolution? mark thesen, conservative columnist for the "washington post" recently suggested that democrats pursue an alternative, censure. in his piece, why dont democrats drop impeachment and just censure trump, he argues that unlike the mueller probe, this time, trump actually did something wrong, but that a minority of americans see it as worthy of impeachment. "if democrats persist and to prove articles of impeachment, it wi...

>> the democrats want him impeached and many want him removed from office. what i find interesting are republicans and independents. among republicans there are clearly shifting articles of defense for him. obviously you see that playing out on fox news as well. now youre hearing republicans say, yeah, he did something wrong, but how big of a deal is it, really? weve been having investigation after investigation. for the independent voters, you know, some obviously lean one way or another, and t...

You look at the evidence and you dont think that the president has done something wrong, perhaps theres something wrong with you. again, that doesnt mean yhe should be removed from office or impeachment. but just from the facts, from the transcript, from the phone call, from the overheard phone call, the evidence is damning. >> it is. but you know what i worry here is that obstruction works in the end, right? you know, the president, the white house has banned the witnesses that would then make ...

Out -- i guess to find out what to do because you were concerned about the political fallout, not about anything being appropriate or wrong with the call, is that correct? >> maam, i dont agree with the question. you saw basically nothing wrong with the call yet you skipped your chain of command to go to counsel because of what? what was the reason for that? >> again, i dont know the premise. if i had seen something wrong -- >> whos your direct report? >> the deputy national security advisor. >>...

Counsel to find out, i guess, to find out what to do because you were concerned about the political fallout, not about anything being inappropriate or wrong with the call, is that correct? >> maam, i dont agree with the premise, no. >> could you tell me why you felt the need, you sign nothing basically wrong with the call, yet you kept your -- skip to your chain of command to go to counsel because of what? what was the reason for that? >> i dont know -- again, i dont agree with the premise. i do...