The Inflation Reduction Act offers a master class in implementing expensive, counterproductive, and highly partisan energy policy. In previous posts, I discussed 1) how the electricity generation subsidies in the Inflation Reduction Act could cost taxpayers $2.5 or $3 trillion and 2) why policymakers should remove those subsidies before expanding the high‐voltage transmission system. As we count the reasons why repealing the energy subsidies in the Inflation Reduction Act is a good idea, let’s also consider their interaction with the Environmental Protection Agency’s (EPA’s) proposed power plant rule.
Crucial for a Clean Energy Economy, the Aluminum Industry s Carbon Footprint Is Enormous insideclimatenews.org - get the latest breaking news, showbiz & celebrity photos, sport news & rumours, viral videos and top stories from insideclimatenews.org Daily Mail and Mail on Sunday newspapers.
AG Reyes Protests More Burdensome, Costly EPA Energy Regulations einnews.com - get the latest breaking news, showbiz & celebrity photos, sport news & rumours, viral videos and top stories from einnews.com Daily Mail and Mail on Sunday newspapers.
These proposed methods to allow combustion power plants to continue to exist are not real and can never work. EPA intends to force the closure of all such electricity generation facilities.