20 Justice Sotomayor host they said it was not final. There is no final determination or listing and we are going to take comment on that as part of the rulemaking to examine the admission standards. The Agency Addresses related to in light of this study address whether such regulation under the section is appropriate and necessary for power plants. It may be necessary to regulate Something Like mercury. That may not be the appropriate Regulatory Regime if their view of the statute is not to focus on whether such regulation is appropriate, whether listing of power plants is under subsection c is appropriate just like every other source. Justice scalia can i ask whether that listing are subject to the categorization device that Justice Breyer was asking about . Could the agency say were going to divide these categories since 80 of plants dont have waterfalls nearby, were going to exempt them from these minimum standards . Mr. Brownell no, your honor not at a listing stage. Justice kagan
You have not thought through it . Needs to be proposed and final i have not even been briefed on that because we are still looking at the science in the right to keep the policy and legal questions aside. Very quickly, you did a National Survey of the willingness of people to pay . I believe it was. Did you also survey the industry to see if they were willing to pay for the epa opinion on whether or not it was cost costeffective, and did you also do a survey to see if people were willing to pay for the loss of jobs and jobs were exported offshore because our plants cannot compete . I think that we are seeing a little bit of apples and oranges. Im not sure its time for me to clarify what the survey was doing and what role it was applying. We will talk offline. Thank you, sir. The gentleman from newtown, mr. Stewart is recognized. Thank you, madam administrator, thank you for being here today. Im sure that you just enjoyed your warning. Im honored to be your. Thank you. I must say that y
Technologies available to it today so it continues to have a path forward. But we dont tend use Research Funds for things that are already been determined adequately demonstrated . Were using Research Funds to try to prove this up youre using it as an example adequately demonstrated. It doesnt make sense. We are coordinating closely with d. O. E. And if you have listened and heard from the d. O. E. Folks today, you will know they share our opinion about its availability and been demonstrated. Its exciting to think that we could make it more costeffective moving forward, and that you could expand the range of sequestration opportunities. So they are actually working very hard with the industry to continue to move that technology forward. That is only good news, sir. Thats not bad news. But we still dont know whether its adequately demonstrated. Gentlemans time is expired. Pursuant to the discussion about the efficiency of the relating to the subpoena. I ask unanimous con stoant enter to
Please let us know and whatever per whatever appropriate form we have and whether or not wouldnni arab countries follow soon. Could you get that pretty quickly . , we will try to provide a written assessment of that. If in fact enrichment of uranium spread throughout the , would you agree that that would be a very bad scenario for the National Security of the United States and israel if nations throughout the mid east turned to enriching uranium . Yes, particularly if it were for other than peaceful purposes. You think iranians are trying to hold a bomb before we get involved . Made theave not determination to go to that step. Aey have approached this from threshold capability. For the iranians the decision is a political one. They certainly have the expertise if they so chose. Would it take them if they made that decision . Them a that depends on a lot of factors and closed sessions. Gentlemen, we appreciate your testimony, your service. I joined a number of colleagues who have asked