indictments, is better than just one for trump because as more of these legal problems come down the pike, the details get lost in the greater number. and people just focus more so on that word, weaponization, that we have been hearing not only from trump but also from his rivals like ron desantis on the campaign trail. so he's able to more so easily rally that base against this bigger system that's out to get him, that's out to get his allies and his supporters, guys. >> all right, we'll let you continue to work on your sourcing and gathering more information. stay close and come back as you have new reporting. dave, the former president, he's been on truth social nonstop in the past few days. this morning, he's calling for a change of venue in the case, suggesting, these are his words, perhaps the, quote, politically unbiased state, west virginia. so clearly, he's implying he can't get a fair trial in d.c.
incredible job explaining everything. you know, this is pay for play. this is something that we suspected. but this is just going along with the more mounting evidence that we have. and frankly, i really liked what representative biggs had stated after leaving thatve big written transcription. you know, we've been every step of the way. you heard last week, the week before last hours, whistleblowers that were saying that literally the irs was running cover for hunter biden because of his connection to joe biden. and you literally have the fbi not following up on information and sourcing because of joe bide on infon. and now you have the department of justice that's literally not doing their job. so the only way that we will truly be able to present these facts to the american people and move forward with actually getting the evidence out there is to launch an impeachment inquiry. and i have news for you, jesse. i was horrifieh and when i heard three republicans from senate saying that they didn't want to move forward t with impeachment for whatever reasons, that this was just a for ta foreasons at imps this is not just tit for tat t impeachment. this guy's publicly corrupit fo
of other markets. so the product will still have to move. and it's very similar with the fruit and vegetables, the proteins and the meats that we move. we often see some seasonality reason or some political tariffs coming in in one particular location, and therefore countries stop sourcing from one particular country or region, but they have to source from somewhere else. so, fundamentally, we have the flexibility to move our containers around the world on different networks to be able to keep that flow going. but on the land—side operation, we continue to see increasing inflationary costs coming through, on transport costs, labour costs, we've had a number of quite large renegotiations to do with the salaries on transport workers on the land—side operations, and all of that comes through as additional costs to the supply chain. so we have to factor that in. on the ocean side, we've, i think, done a lot of innovation on shipping
we move actually a lot of rice in containers. and so we won't be moving so many containers of rice out of india. but the final markets where that indian rice was being consumed will now have to source rice out of other markets. so the product will still have to move. and it's very similar with the fruit and vegetables, the proteins and the meats that we move. we often see some seasonality reason or some political tariffs coming in in one particular location, and therefore countries stop sourcing from one particular country or region, but they have to source from somewhere else. so fundamentally, we have the flexibility to move our containers around the world on different networks to be able to keep that flow going. but on the land side operation, we continue to see increasing inflationary costs coming through, on transport costs, labour costs, we've had a number of quite large renegotiations to do with the salaries on transport workers on the land side operations, and all of that comes
still in containers which are commodity related. so, you know, for example, the rice ban in india in the last couple of weeks, i mean, as an industry, we move actually a lot of rice in containers. and so we won't be moving so many containers of rice out of india. but the final markets where that indian rice was being consumed will now have to source rice out of other markets. so the product will still have to move. and it's very similar with the fruit and vegetables, the proteins and the meats that we move. we often see some seasonality reason or some political tariffs coming in in one particular location, and therefore countries stop sourcing from one particular country or region, but they have to source from somewhere else. so fundamentally, we have the flexibility to move our containers around the world on different networks to be able to keep that flow going. but on the land side operation, we continue to see increasing inflationary costs coming through, on transport costs,
found other sources for their sourcing from multiple sources now some has restored the supply chains are closer to production of markets at home. that would likely mitigate against really serious supply chain disruptions in the future mitigate at least someone. is it possible this could go off the rails the fed gets it wrong something else intervenes and you have a spike of inflation again? that is entirely possible. so far the trend lines are pretty much all positive for the economy. >> some democrats raising some concern. larry summers obama's secretary of treasury thinking the manufacturing part of 'bidenomics' he fears will spike inflation let listen to what larry summers said about this. we have full screen there is. i am profoundly concerned by the doctoring manufacturing sector economic nationalism that is richly put forth as a general
documents, and information in these documents, went to anyone who was not authorized to see it, let alone, when i say anyone, the worst possible thing, which would be a foreign adversary, then there are all sorts of ways that the fbi, the nsa, can conduct court authorized surveillance, just to emphasize, this would be with court approval. so that is another potential way that they would know about that conversation. as i noted, it's unusual because there is no sourcing for that particular statement. >> i think there's a third way as well. andrew's right about ways wanted to. the only other possibility, the evidence we basis for that statement is a contemporaneous account of it. de oliveira has a conversation with trump in presence of someone any spontaneously describes a conversation. we for instance, in our hearings, and a lot of
wire. remember, this is a conversation that is happening a couple of weeks after the search was conducted at mar-a-lago. and if you are concerned, from a national security point of view, about whether these documents, and information in these documents, went to anyone who was not authorized to see it, let alone, when i say anyone, the worst possible thing, which would be a foreign adversary, then there are all sorts of ways that the fbi, the nsa, can conduct court authorized surveillance, just to emphasize, this would be with court approval. so that is another potential way that they would know about that conversation. as i noted, it's unusual because there is no sourcing for that particular statement. >> i think there's a third way as well.
in terms of transporting goods and the costs and i thinkjust generally in terms of of crops, you know, we move a lot of products still in containers which are commodity related. so, you know, for example, the rice ban in india the last couple ban in india in the last couple of weeks, i mean, as an industry, we move actually a lot of rice in containers. and so we won't be moving so many containers of rice out of india. but the final markets where that indian rice was being consumed will now have to source rice out of other markets. so the product will still have to move. and it's very similar with the fruit and vegetables, the proteins and the meats that we move. we often see some seasonality reason or some political tariffs coming in in one particular location, and therefore countries stop sourcing from one particular country or region, but they have to source from somewhere else. so fundamentally, we have the flexibility to move our containers around the world on different networks to be able to keep that flow going. but on the land side operation, we continue to see increasing inflationary costs coming through on transport costs, labor through on transport costs, labour costs, we've had a number of quite