Building at zsfg for review and comment. Good afternoon, department staff. The project for you is a excuse me. Ill need to recuse myself for this item. I move that you be recused. Second. I need to stay in the last year i had a financial relationship with arg which is a consultant on this project which is why. Very good on the motion to r commissioner hyland . That motion passes unanimously. The project for you is a review and comment on the ucsf research and Academic Building at the Zuckerberg San Francisco general hospital. Seeking concurrence on the project design relative to mitigation that was adopted as part of the Environmental Impact report for the project. The project includes demolition of a parking lot. Its a fivestory research facility. Comprising a mix of dry laboratory space, wet labs and desk top research. The project would retain some of the historic elements on the site, including fence, guardhouse and two gate pillars. As you see in the packet we provided, we provided
Find out actually who designed these buildings because dear old mr. Thorpe passed away before they were ever finished. Thank you. Anyone else like to make a Public Comment at this time . Closing Public Comment and bringing it back to the commission, anybody . Commissioner perlman . I would first like to ask, how do we follow up on mr. Hasses comments . Is that something the staff should do . We can certainly look into it. Theres obviously a number of projects that have occurred on the campus, so maybe as we explore future review, we can flush it out as a question. It would be good to get the record straight, because i know from the next project of the civic center, mr. Hasse has taken us to task about that. I wanted to comment about this project. I think we had looked at this at the arc quite awhile ago, and this has come quite a long, long way from the kind of massing studmassingstudy we were presend i think this is a nice building. The whole thing was odd to me because theres a fence
The community had for the c. O. F. Raised 30,000 for playground equipment. And then in addition at this time was able to raise an additional 150,000 for playground equipment through the Public Health foundation. So as i mentioned before at Capital Committee, the grant award that was a federal grant was actually retained detained in washington awaiting some signatures for them to give us the award money. So we couldnt start the project. At the time, i started to go to all the different communities around there to let them know what we were doing with the project because some time had passed, especially since 94124 had Extensive Community outreach at the time and there was a lot of support for the project during that time. When i went out, the Community Requested to be able to have an area where they can have Community Events on a lawn, such as picnic tables, bouncy houses, barbecues, things like that. Because we had most of the area dedicated to the field, it was hard to have it along k
Additional 150,000 for playground equipment through the Public Health foundation. So as i mentioned before at Capital Committee, the grant award that was a federal grant was actually retained detained in washington awaiting some signatures for them to give us the award money. So we couldnt start the project. At the time, i started to go to all the different communities around there to let them know what we were doing with the project because some time had passed, especially since 94124 had Extensive Community outreach at the time and there was a lot of support for the project during that time. When i went out, the Community Requested to be able to have an area where they can have Community Events on a lawn, such as picnic tables, bouncy houses, barbecues, things like that. Because we had most of the area dedicated to the field, it was hard to have it along keith street in particular. They didnt want a park along 3rd street because theres no parking there and its unsafe to unload in tha
Awarded 300,000 to the bay view hill zone and park 94124 to renovate and possibly expand the playground which is in the center of the property. The plan that you see on the right happens to be the plan that you approved at that time. Since then, some changes have happened. We also came back in 2017 to accept a grant award from a federal grant that was administered through the state of california for 375,000 in order to add to this plan a pathway that would allow both youth and seniors to have a loop around the park and also have some adult exercise equipment. The community had for the c. O. F. Raised 30,000 for playground equipment. And then in addition at this time was able to raise an additional 150,000 for playground equipment through the Public Health foundation. So as i mentioned before at Capital Committee, the grant award that was a federal grant was actually retained detained in washington awaiting some signatures for them to give us the award money. So we couldnt start the pro