a spokesman for president bush said this. president bush spoke a lot about this during his presidency and he won t be weighing in anew now. or commenting on or giving oxygen to anything of trump s bluster. this one, candidates have used words like unhinged, offensive, dangerous and outrageous. as kay henderson reports, one republican contender who is embracing a part of trump s proposal. santorum saying muslims from syria and libya, areas of radicalization should not be allowed. i disagree with that proposal. i like donald trump. a lot of us friends here have encouraged me to criticize and attack donald trump.
so the reverberating reaction to donald trump s call to ban all muslims from entering the united states, has sucked up a lot of oxygen on television. we don t want to overlook that there are some new developments in the widening investigation into the san bernardino attacks. the fbi now says the gunmen had been radicalized for some time, carefully plotting their attack inside their home. the big question right now, did they have help in planning or executing the deadly shooting? here s what nbc news can confirm. investigators are looking into a $28,500 into his bank account in the weeks leading up to the attack. that with cell phone and documents from the couple s apartment are all being examined to determine the role of any [ inaudible ] that is where the focus is right now. i assume, are there any not
get an auto insurance quote and see why 92% of our members plan to stay for life. coming up, we ll have more on donald trump and what is going on. plus, i ll let you know how bernie sanders is trying to stay on script. he didn t want to talk a lot about isis today, but he had to. we ll be right back.
national intelligence estimate. that s strange off the bat. background of the chemical weapons program. the preparations for the attack. the duration of the attack and intelligence relating to the post attack period. the preparations for the attack is very interesting. the report states flatly in the three days prior to the attack we, meaning the united states intelligence community, collected streams of human signals and geo spatial intelligence that reveal regime activities that we assess associated with preparations for chemical weapons attack. that raises the question. you you were collecting all this information, you tell us in the three days prior to the attack we collected these streams. did anyone raise a warning? if so, how high up the chain did that go? if not, why not? and what we have heard back from the intelligence community after questioning them on this is that it didn t really make sense as to what it was all about until after word. i suspect also there is a risk. al