Statements. The whistleblower got caught with chairman schiff. Remember chairman schiff, the person that the democrats instead of the House Judiciary Committee which spent a full week on this, thats not whos been in charge. The person they put in charge was the person that got caught with the whistleblower. Have you spoken directly with the whistleblower . No, we have not. Wed like to. That wasnt true. The person that said he had evidence of the first fake impeachment scam, collusion with russia, had evidence of that collusion and didnt have it. The person who in the course of that read into the record the steele dossier because the people needed to know the truth about what happened. Well, we heard about the truth about the steele dossier this week when the Inspector General told us it was all garbage, rubbish, all made up, yeah, that chairman schiff, and now he got caught not being truthful about
a whistleblower who as i said you the other day didnt Tell The Truth verbally and in wri
the president didn t have corrupt intent and that s why the democrats cannot make out a prime fascia case. contrary to shift s parody version of the july 25 call, the president wasn t asking the ukraine to, quote unquote, make up dirt about my opponent. that quote came from a parody from chairman schiff. the president didn t say it in the phone call. for whatever reason that is being missed. there was also significant reason to believe that the bidens were involved in corruption and there s also evidence ukrainian officials colluded with democrats in the 2016 campaign. there s been a lot of talk about this being a conspiracy theory. it s not a speconspiracy theory. also, the president was not seeking to help with his 2020 campaign. rather, he was seeking accountability regarding ukraine democrat collusion in 2016 and
covering the state department, nbc news national political reporter, josh letterman. also with me, third-way vice president and former house intel committee staffer, mika o yang. peter, did we misinterpret or did he basically just admit to everything that the democrats have been trying to uncover? reporter: well, to be clear, there s a little bit of a nuance here, right? he did acknowledge, though not using the word quid pro quo, that there was, in effect, a quid pro quo. that money was withheld. military assistance was withheld from ukraine basically dependent upon them investigating what took place in 2016. the president trying to get to the heart of the speconspiracy theory, suggesting that ukraine played some role alongside the democrats, in effect, to try to tip the scales of the election away from president trump. he said that there was not a quid pro quo and that there was nothing to do with the biasdens there. that that was not one of the issues that was at play here. but the