to talk, i m leaving. this was classic mom 101 to me. you know, and look, she can do this in a way her husband cannot. he s the president. she s the first lady. heckling the president comes with a certain amount of, okay, i get it. heckling the first lady, people hold their first ladies generally in higher esteem, and it comes across ruder when you are doing spouse of. she didn t get elected to anything. the president. a public campaign rally, you might expect. this is a private fund-raiser where you think you re among friends. i think she was offended, saying i m helping you raise money and now i have someone yelling in my face, fine, i m going to leave. this administration, this white house has been very supportive of gay rights, same-sex marriage, other gay rights issues as well. for them all of a sudden to be heckled by somebody who wants even more hit a sensitive nerve. my bottom line is you don t mess around with the first lady. she s a tough lady. or in the crowley home,
constitutional right to do what she wants it is unseemly this had is the supreme court justice. the supreme court, i think, tries at least to give the appearance that it is not politically motivate or playing politics, now you have the spouse of, you know, a critical vote for the conservative side playing a very active and public role in conservative politics. it is really unchartered territory, i have never seen it before or heard of something like this in previous supreme court justices but i think it is going to start raising some serious questions, if he has to clarence thomas has to vote on a case that has something to do with the tea party at some moment to or in the future, i don t know how he doesn t recuse himself. wasn t that citizens united? that is a fair point. i don t know what her involvement was in that case directly or indirectly, let s say some other point down the road there is another type of case on campaign finance that involves directly some kind of tea par