Favor . Opposed . The motion carries. At this time im going to call for the Public Comments of any item not on todays agenda. Have any speakers today . Okay, moving on to the next item item 5 is communications. Commissioners any comments . I do have one speaker on item 5 d. Christine hanson. Could you come forward, please . I have 2. Good afternoon commissioners. My name is Christine Hanson and im speaking to you today as a member of the save ccsf coalition. I would thrike address the Real Estate Service report of the attempt of [inaudible] along where the Mayors Office to [inaudible] Housing Development at the bal bola reservoir. It is claimed on one end by the sfpuc and on the onet end city college is in deed still one parcel. The u. S. And history has been intertwined between ccsf and the Water Department for decades rchlt i document written by joans and stokes entitled common sequa mistakes [inaudible] to declare a parking lot full of car suhr plus is to [inaudible] with the common
Differential if there was one for a second increment of power purchase and have that be a source of funds for second increment if it turned out to be more expensive. [multiple voices] i dont know if thats consistent with what the board ordinance says. But if there is room for that, i think it would be interesting to pursue it. It does sound interesting. It may require another action, though. The language and the resolution from the board indicated that we should recover it, but it didnt indicate the time frame. So, there was sort of an expression of moving towards recovering those rates recovering the costs from that customer group. I think you and i are concerned about the time frame. Well, yes. If it is in fact flexible, if you built in that increment in the rates and the intent would be that if the price stayed the same, you would start the repayment of the reserves. If it didnt, then you would simply postpone the repayment of reserves until the next time you set power rates, presum
Embedded in that conversation will be a conversation about how do we how are we actually engaging with customers or potential customers. Opt out how proactive are we being and with which customer groups, and how more responsive mode were in with customer groups. Because there will be an element, i think, given the size of the program that were envisioning. There will be an element of us actively engaging with customers, but there will also be customers who will call us up. In fact, weve already had some potential customers call us already expressing an interest in participating in the program. So, we need to be ready to address sort of both levels of customer interest and that will help us shape our preenrollment and our statutory opt out portions of our roll out of our plan. I wonder if i may also respond to something you said, commissioner moran, about the solicitation and outreach. And that you were imagining we would need to make a determination as to the size of the program before
Of rate to either pay back the reserve or pay a price differential if there was one for a second increment of power purchase and have that be a source of funds for second increment if it turned out to be more expensive. [multiple voices] i dont know if thats consistent with what the board ordinance says. But if there is room for that, i think it would be interesting to pursue it. It does sound interesting. It may require another action, though. The language and the resolution from the board indicated that we should recover it, but it didnt indicate the time frame. So, there was sort of an expression of moving towards recovering those rates recovering the costs from that customer group. I think you and i are concerned about the time frame. Well, yes. If it is in fact flexible, if you built in that increment in the rates and the intent would be that if the price stayed the same, you would start the repayment of the reserves. If it didnt, then you would simply postpone the repayment of re
Help us shape our preenrollment and our statutory opt out portions of our roll out of our plan. I wonder if i may also respond to something you said, commissioner moran, about the solicitation and outreach. And that you were imagining we would need to make a determination as to the size of the program before, if i heard you correctly, before solicitation and outreach. And i just wanted to say that from our perspective, part of the shaping of the program and the size of the program will be in response to some of the outreach we perform. So, you know, as those prior surveys informed us, we expect that we will need to be talking with potential customers to understand if theyre still as interested in the program as they were at the prices we expressed when we last talked to them. Now that the board has told us to incorporate the security costs into the rates, now that were incorporating 20 discount for lowincome customers and recovery of those costs from other customers, the price is going